Achieving equity in genomic testing for breast cancer through partner-led strategies and policies.
Abstract
11027 Background: Genomic testing is recommended for individuals with estrogen/progesterone receptor-positive, HER2-negative early-stage breast cancer to determine the need for chemotherapy alongside endocrine therapy. However, access disparities persist by race, ethnicity, and income. This study aims to identify modifiable barriers and co-design policy recommendations for equitable genomic testing for low-income, and racial and ethnic minoritized people with breast cancer in Northern California. Methods: Using community-based participatory research and expert panel methods, we collaborated with an 18-member expert panel of patients, caregivers, oncology clinicians, community organizations, advocates, and policymakers to identify modifiable barriers and propose solutions. Phase 1 involved an 85-question survey and semi-structured interviews with patients, caregivers, clinicians, navigators, policymakers, and payers, administered by bilingual community health workers in Spanish, Tagalog, and Chinese, to assess genomic testing barriers and solutions. Phase 2 used Delphi consensus methods with the expert panel to finalize policy recommendations. Results: Of 912 invited, 831 participated in surveys (90% response rate), and all 30 purposively sampled individuals participated in interviews (100% response rate). Survey participants included 514 patients, 101 caregivers, 94 clinicians, 74 navigators, 25 policymakers, and 23 payers. Among patients, 102 (19.8%) were Asian, 132 (25.7%) Black, 138 (26.9%) Hispanic White, 28 (5.5%) Non-Hispanic White, and the remainder preferred not to answer. Racial and ethnic minoritized patients had significantly lower odds of genomic testing compared to Non-Hispanic Whites: Black patients 86% lower (OR: 0.15; 95% CI: 0.07-0.31), Asian patients 71% lower (OR: 0.29; 95% CI: 0.14-0.59), and Hispanic White patients 79% lower (OR: 0.21; 95% CI: 0.11-0.43). Four themes emerged from interviews: 1) limited awareness/resources, 2) inequitable care, 3) financial/cultural barriers, and 4) insufficient social support. The expert panel reached consensus on policy recommendations, including mandating reflexive, fully reimbursed genomic testing (mean rating ± SD: 8.3 ± 0.9), eliminating prior authorization (8.2 ± 0.8), removing co-pays/out-of-pocket costs (8.1 ± 0.8), and providing educational materials in preferred languages with lay terminology (7.9 ± 1.2). Conclusions: Disparities in genomic testing persist, highlighting the need for targeted interventions. Policy recommendations co-designed with communities and other interested groups can be implemented to improve equitable care.
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (15)
Mary Umahi Obasi
Stanford University School of Medicine, Division of Oncology, Stanford, CA
Sophia Akatue
Meharry Medical College School of Medicine, Nashville, TN
Emily Hayes Wood
Division of Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
Ysabel Duron
The Latino Cancer Institute, San Jose, CA
Kasandra Escobar
Division of Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
Sacha Moufarrej
University of California San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, CA
Rafaay Kamran
Division of Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
Shannon Muir
Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford, CA
Fatima Munoz
San Ysidro Health Center, San Diego, CA
Mariana C. Stern
Scarlett L. Gomez
Greater Bay Area Cancer Registry, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
Douglas W. Blayney
Helen K. Chew
UC Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, Sacramento, CA
Lisa Tealer
Bay Area Community Health Advisory Council, South San Francisco, CA
Manali I. Patel
Division of Oncology, Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA