Accessing the universal phase behavior of block copolymer melts with complex-Langevin field-theoretic simulations

M Mark W. Matsen (Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Waterloo 1 , Waterloo, Ontario N2L 3G1,) J Jorge Ramírez J James D. Willis (Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Waterloo 1 , Waterloo, Ontario N2L 3G1,) P Pedro D. Pina (Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Waterloo 1 , Waterloo, Ontario N2L 3G1,)

Abstract

The universal phase behavior of block copolymer melts demonstrated previously with particle-based simulations is reproduced using complex-Langevin field-theoretic simulations (CL-FTSs) combined with the Morse calibration. For comparison purposes, the calculations are repeated using conventional Langevin field-theoretic simulations (L-FTSs), where the partial saddle-point approximation (PSPA) is applied to the pressure field. Both FTS methods produce consistent results down to invariant polymerization indices of N̄≈105, implying that the inaccuracies in the PSPA are well compensated for by the Morse calibration. At lower N̄, however, the complex fields of the CL-FTSs become prone to the formation of hot spots, causing the simulations to fail. Previous studies have shown that finite-range interactions can help stabilize CL-FTSs. Aided by the L-FTSs, we locate conditions at N̄=104, under which the universality is expected to hold and the CL-FTSs are stable. While the L-FTSs continue to obey universality, the CL-FTSs deviate significantly. A number of potential explanations are considered, but only one appears credible. Given the documented problems with CL simulations of nonpolymeric models, it is likely that the inconsistency with universality results from a “silent failure” in the CL-FTSs, preceding the formation of hot spots.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 164, Issue 1
Published January 07, 2026
ISSN 0021-9606
Publisher American Institute of Physics

Journal Info

The Journal of Chemical Physics

American Institute of Physics

ISSN: 0021-9606 Physical Sciences

Authors (4)

M

Mark W. Matsen

Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Waterloo 1 , Waterloo, Ontario N2L 3G1,

J

Jorge Ramírez

J

James D. Willis

Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Waterloo 1 , Waterloo, Ontario N2L 3G1,

P

Pedro D. Pina

Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Waterloo 1 , Waterloo, Ontario N2L 3G1,