Abstract WE511: Reduced Blood Pressure and Improved Survival in Patients with Normal Blood Pressure to Severe Hypertension Treated with the Very Low Sodium Rice Diet

P Pao-Hwa Lin (Duke University Medicine Nephrology, Durham, North Carolina, United States) Y Yi-Ju Li J Jong ok La (Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, United States) C Crystal Tyson (DUKE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER, Elon, North Carolina, United States) P Philip Klemmer (University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States) W William McDowell (Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, United States) A Anastacia Bohannon (Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, United States) F Friedrich Luft (EXPERIMENTAL AND CLINICAL RESEARCH, Berlin, Germany) S Scott Sanoff (Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, United States) F Francis Neelon (Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, United States)

Abstract

Introduction: High sodium intake increases risks of hypertension (HTN) and mortality, but the impact of very low sodium intake is uncertain. No studies have examined dietary sodium as low as those in the original Rice Diet (RD: ~200 mg/d sodium, ~5% calories each from protein and fat). We retrospectively assessed factors associated with systolic blood pressure (SBP) change and survival of RD-treated patients across BP categories. Methods: We identified 12,312 adults (1942-1994) who consumed the RD for ≥7 days. Urinary chloride (UCl≤42mg/dl) indicated diet adherence. Multivariable linear regression examined factors linked with SBP change. Actuarial survival analysis compared survival by BP groups. Cox proportional hazards model assessed factors influencing survival. Observed and predicted life expectancy was compared using US Social Security Administration (SSA) life-tables. Significance was defined as p<0.05. Results: Patients were mostly female (64.8%), median age 48 [34,57] years, BMI 32.9 [0.1, 38.5] kg/m 2 . SBP declined rapidly during the first 4 weeks (Figure 1) and remained stable to week 52. Greater 12-week SBP reduction was associated with higher baseline SBP (β[95%CI]:-0.57[-0.59,-0.55]), better diet adherence(-0.05[-0.07,-0.04]), and greater weight loss(-0.42[-0.53,-0.31]); smaller reductions were linked to older age(0.1[0.07,0.14]) and worse kidney function(0.13[0.08,0.19]). Across BP groups, baseline SBP consistently predicted SBP decline. Survival (Figure 2) was longest in the normal BP group, followed by elevated and stage 1 HTN, which were similar, and markedly less in stage 2 and severe HTN. A larger first-month SBP reduction was strongly and progressively associated with improved survival (Table). Older age, male sex, worse kidney function, and higher baseline SBP increased mortality risk; higher BMI and better diet adherence were protective. Mortality risk was most influenced by male sex and early SBP reduction. Compared with SSA life tables, RD patients with normal, elevated, stage 1 and stage 2 HTN lived 4.1, 5.0, 3.7 and 1.0 yrs longer, respectively, whereas those with severe HTN lived 11 yrs less. Conclusions: The RD was associated with lowered SBP and improved survival. SBP reduction and survival benefits were comparable in elevated and stage 1 HTN, with benefit even in the normal BP group. Survival improved proportionally to the magnitude of SBP reduction, underscoring the strong impact of intensive diet intervention on BP and mortality.

Article Details

Journal Circulation
Volume / Issue Vol. 153, Issue Suppl_1
Published March 24, 2026
ISSN 0009-7322
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Circulation

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0009-7322 Health Sciences

Authors (10)

P

Pao-Hwa Lin

Duke University Medicine Nephrology, Durham, North Carolina, United States

Y

Yi-Ju Li

J

Jong ok La

Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, United States

C

Crystal Tyson

DUKE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER, Elon, North Carolina, United States

P

Philip Klemmer

University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States

W

William McDowell

Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, United States

A

Anastacia Bohannon

Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, United States

F

Friedrich Luft

EXPERIMENTAL AND CLINICAL RESEARCH, Berlin, Germany

S

Scott Sanoff

Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, United States

F

Francis Neelon

Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, United States