Abstract TU279: Neighborhood as a Window to Women’s Health 15 Years After Pregnancy: Do Income and Food Access Play a Role?

M Maria Figucia (University of Pittsburgh- Magee Womens Research Institute, Gibsonia, Pennsylvania, United States) N Noelle Crane (University of Pittsburgh- Magee Womens Research Institute, Gibsonia, Pennsylvania, United States) S Samantha Bryan (Magee Women's Research Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States) R Robin Gandley (MAGEE WOMENS RESEARCH INSITITUTE, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States) J Janet Catov (UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States)

Abstract

Introduction: Food environment is directly related to food choice, diet quality, and health outcomes. Access, availability, and food cost are all factors in a food environment. Purpose: To determine if neighborhood factors can provide insight into women’s health in the years after pregnancy and examine if income and food accessibility relate to diet quality. Hypothesis: Women in low-income (LI), low-access (LA) areas in the Pittsburgh area will have lower Cardiovascular health (CVH) diet scores (less ideal diet quality). Methods: CVH was evaluated in the first 149 women (mean age 44 years; 15 years after pregnancy) recruited into the Window Brain Study with completed diet surveys (MEPA), using the American Heart Association’s Life’s Essential 8 (LE8). CVH scores (0-100, higher is healthier) were generated using LE8 components, including diet. Neighborhoods (census tracts) were assigned GeoIDs and matched with the USDA’s Food Access Research Atlas to assess access to food-stores (within ½-mile in urban areas or 10-miles in rural areas). It also identifies LI areas based on the Department of Treasury’s Markets Tax Credit program (tract poverty rate of 20+%; or a tract median family income is < 80% of their area’s median family income). Results: Women classified as LILA (N=35, 23%) had significantly lower CVH diet scores (25(25,50) vs 50(25,50) P=0.001) compared to not LILA (N=114) and scored significantly lower on the MEPA questionnaire ((7(6,9) vs 8(7, 10) P=0.005), as seen in Table 1. LILA also had higher HbA1C levels (5.55(5.20, 5.95) vs 5.40(5.10,5.50)) P= 0.021) and a history of gestational diabetes (17% vs 8% P=0.103). Overall CVH scores of the LILA group tended to be less healthy (63.3 ±12.7 vs 68.4 ± 13.6 P=0.108). Of the health behaviors, diet and physical activity (PA) had the lowest mean CVH scores in both groups. Conclusion: Enhanced nutrition education and awareness of food accessibility are critical to improve CVH. Diet quality and PA posit opportunities to improve overall CVH among women residing in LILA neighborhoods.

Article Details

Journal Circulation
Volume / Issue Vol. 153, Issue Suppl_1
Published March 24, 2026
ISSN 0009-7322
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Circulation

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0009-7322 Health Sciences

Authors (5)

M

Maria Figucia

University of Pittsburgh- Magee Womens Research Institute, Gibsonia, Pennsylvania, United States

N

Noelle Crane

University of Pittsburgh- Magee Womens Research Institute, Gibsonia, Pennsylvania, United States

S

Samantha Bryan

Magee Women's Research Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

R

Robin Gandley

MAGEE WOMENS RESEARCH INSITITUTE, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

J

Janet Catov

UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States