Abstract Sun708: The Impact of Intra-Arrest TEE on Epinephrine Administration in In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Resuscitative TEE Collaborative Registry (rTEECoRe) Study

C Clark Owyang (New York Presbyterian Weill Cornell, New York, New York, United States) J Joaquin Araos (Cornell University College of Veterinary Medicine, Ithaca, New York, United States) A Aaron Landau (Weil Cornell New York Presbyterian, New York, New York, United States) C Caleb Suh (Cornell University College of Veterinary Medicine, Ithaca, New York, United States) S Sarah Stucky (University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States) G Gabriela Galli (New York Presbyterian Weill Cornell, New York, New York, United States) B Brady Rippon W Walid Farooqi (New York Presbyterian Weill Cornell, New York, New York, United States) K Katharine Burns (Advocate Health, Chicago, Illinois, United States) J Jennifer Stancati (Advocate Health, Chicago, Illinois, United States) R Rohan Panchamia (New York Presbyterian Weill Cornell, New York, New York, United States) N Nathaniel Sands (Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, United States) A Aarthi Kaviyarasu (University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States) B Benjamin Abella (Mount Sinai School of Medicine, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States) F Felipe Teran (Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, United States)

Abstract

Background: Intra-arrest transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is increasingly used during in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) to guide resuscitation with evidence that directing the area of maximal compression (AMC) may improve outcomes. While TEE offers potential benefits for real-time decision-making, limited data exist regarding the impact of intra-arrest TEE on standard CA resuscitative efforts. We analyzed the Resuscitative TEE Collaborative Registry (rTEECoRe), a multicenter registry of acute care TEE, to evaluate the safety profile of intra-arrest TEE. We examined the temporal relationship of TEE-guided AMC evaluation attempt with the delivery of standard epinephrine administration. Methods: We analyzed IHCA patients evaluated with TEE collected through the Resuscitative TEE Collaborative Registry (NCT04972526). Patients in whom TEE was used to evaluate the AMC and those without AMC evaluation were included for analysis. We investigated the association between the attempt to identify the AMC and the timing of standard resuscitation interventions, specifically the time to first epinephrine administration. Linear regression was used to assess the relationship between AMC evaluation attempt and time to first epinephrine. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. Results: Among 117 patients who received intra-arrest TEE during in-hospital cardiac arrest, attempts to evaluate the AMC were not associated with significant delays in the administration of the first epinephrine dose (p = 0.114). In logistic regression analysis, AMC evaluation attempt was also not associated with return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) (odds ratio [OR] 1.53, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.59–4.11; p = 0.39) or survival to hospital discharge (OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.15–2.06; p = 0.34). Other covariates, including age, sex, CPR modality, initial rhythm, and arrest location, were not significantly associated with either outcome. Conclusion: In this multicenter cohort of patients undergoing intra-arrest TEE during IHCA, evaluation of AMC was not associated with delays in epinephrine administration or with differences in ROSC or survival to discharge. These findings support the idea that focused intra-arrest TEE imaging, including the assessment of AMC, can be performed without compromising the timely delivery of standard resuscitation interventions.

Article Details

Journal Circulation
Volume / Issue Vol. 152, Issue Suppl_3
Published November 04, 2025
ISSN 0009-7322
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Circulation

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0009-7322 Health Sciences

Authors (15)

C

Clark Owyang

New York Presbyterian Weill Cornell, New York, New York, United States

J

Joaquin Araos

Cornell University College of Veterinary Medicine, Ithaca, New York, United States

A

Aaron Landau

Weil Cornell New York Presbyterian, New York, New York, United States

C

Caleb Suh

Cornell University College of Veterinary Medicine, Ithaca, New York, United States

S

Sarah Stucky

University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States

G

Gabriela Galli

New York Presbyterian Weill Cornell, New York, New York, United States

B

Brady Rippon

W

Walid Farooqi

New York Presbyterian Weill Cornell, New York, New York, United States

K

Katharine Burns

Advocate Health, Chicago, Illinois, United States

J

Jennifer Stancati

Advocate Health, Chicago, Illinois, United States

R

Rohan Panchamia

New York Presbyterian Weill Cornell, New York, New York, United States

N

Nathaniel Sands

Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, United States

A

Aarthi Kaviyarasu

University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

B

Benjamin Abella

Mount Sinai School of Medicine, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States

F

Felipe Teran

Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, United States