Abstract Sat904: A Recalled Experience of Death Among Cardiac Arrest Survivors Is Associated with Improved Psychological Outcomes

I Imani Goins (NYU Langone Health, New York, New York, United States) C Cambell Ingram (NYU Langone Health, New York, New York, United States) L Lijing Wei (NYU Langone Health, New York City, New York, United States) A Anelly Gonzales (NYU Langone Health, New York, New York, United States) T Tun He (NYU Langone Health, New York, New York, United States) S Sacha Moore (NYU Langone Health, New York, New York, United States) S Sam Parnia (NYU Langone Health, New York, New York, United States)

Abstract

Background: Cardiac Arrest (CA) studies report negative psychological outcomes (anxiety (13-61%), depression (14-45%), post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) (19-27%)) among survivors. In contrast, ~10% of survivors report unique positive experiences of a purposeful review of life events, a perception of lucidity with external visual awareness, and transformation with greater meaning, referred to as a recalled experience of death (RED). Hypothesis: Undergoing a recalled experience of death during CA may protect against negative psychological outcomes, and increase positive psychological outcomes among survivors. Methods: We established an ongoing cross-sectional study to examine psychological outcomes of CA survivors. Inclusion: CA history; age ≥ 18. We collected demographics and utilized validated scales: GAD-7 (anxiety), PHQ-9 (depression), SSS-PTSD, EQ-8 (empathy), Benefit Finding scale, Prosocial Altruistic Personality scale, SCBCS (compassion), SHS (happiness), GQ-6 (gratitude), SFI (life-satisfaction), DSES (spirituality), TFS (forgiveness), MCSDS (social desirability), LOT-R (optimism), and PTGI-SF (post-traumatic growth). RED was identified with a validated scale (near death scale) and interview confirmation. Outcomes were tested with bivariate analyses, controlled for false-discovery rate. A regression model was fitted to control for significant covariates. Results: Among 135 CA survivors, 26 (19%) had a RED. No reported differences in anxiety or depression were found. However, PTSD was higher in those with RED vs. No-RED (65% vs. 32%; p =0.03), with 98% reporting PTSD only after CA. Among positive psychological outcomes, those with RED had higher scores in benefit finding ( Mdn =65 vs. 57; p =0.03), altruism ( Mdn =46 vs. 35; p =0.04), spirituality ( Mdn =25 vs. 16; p =0.02), and PTGI ( Mdn =37 vs. 27; p =0.02) vs. No-RED. Bivariate analyses between PTSD and positive psychological outcomes showed a difference only in PTGI ( p =0.014). Even after adjusting for PTSD, those with RED demonstrated significantly greater PTGI vs. No-RED (β=6.98, SE =2.7, 95% CI [1.6, 12.4], p =0.012). Conclusion: PTSD may occur more frequently in CA survivors who undergo a RED, however, RED is itself associated with greater positive psychological outcomes (altruism, benefit finding, spirituality, growth). Studies are needed to evaluate the mechanism underlying RED, PTSD and positive psychological outcomes and establish future clinical trials targeting improvements in psychological outcomes.

Article Details

Journal Circulation
Volume / Issue Vol. 152, Issue Suppl_3
Published November 04, 2025
ISSN 0009-7322
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Circulation

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0009-7322 Health Sciences

Authors (7)

I

Imani Goins

NYU Langone Health, New York, New York, United States

C

Cambell Ingram

NYU Langone Health, New York, New York, United States

L

Lijing Wei

NYU Langone Health, New York City, New York, United States

A

Anelly Gonzales

NYU Langone Health, New York, New York, United States

T

Tun He

NYU Langone Health, New York, New York, United States

S

Sacha Moore

NYU Langone Health, New York, New York, United States

S

Sam Parnia

NYU Langone Health, New York, New York, United States