Abstract P3075: Diet quality and risk of hypertension in women cancer survivors

Y Yong-Moon Park N Nithya Neelakantan (University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, United States) S Susan Steck (University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, United States) H Hazel Nichols (University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States) K Katie OBrien (National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, United States) M Michael Fradley (Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia (M.F.).) M Mario Schootman (University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, United States) B Benjamin Amick (University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, United States) D Dale Sandler (National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, United States)

Abstract

Background: Higher diet quality has been associated with reduced hypertension risk in the general population. Although women cancer survivors are at elevated risk of hypertension following cancer treatment, it is unclear if diet quality is also associated with risk of hypertension among women cancer survivors. Methods: We analyzed 1,441 women (aged 35 to 74 years) from the Sister Study (2003-2009) who reported a history of cancer other than non-melanoma skin cancer and had no prevalent hypertension at enrollment. Prevalent hypertension was defined as systolic blood pressure (BP) ≥140 mmHg, diastolic BP ≥90 mmHg, or the use of antihypertensive medication at enrollment. Participants diagnosed with cancer within one year of enrollment were excluded. The median time since diagnosis was 11.4 years. Participants were followed through September 2021 (median follow-up: 11.6 years). Dietary quality was assessed using the validated 110-item Block food frequency questionnaire and categorized into quartiles based on the entire Sister Study population for Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH), Healthy Eating Index (HEI-2015), alternate Mediterranean diet (aMED), and alternative Healthy Eating Index (aHEI-2010). Incident hypertension was self-reported as a new diagnosis or initiation of antihypertensive medication at any time during follow-up. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for incident hypertension. Results: After adjusting for potential confounders, higher DASH scores were associated with decreased risk of incident hypertension (HR Q4vsQ1 0.63, 95% CI 0.48-0.84, P trend =0.01). Associations were weaker for aMED (HR Q4vsQ1 0.78, 95% CI 0.59-1.03, P trend =0.09) and HEI-2015 (HR Q4vsQ1 0.78, 95% CI 0.60-1.03, P trend =0.12), and no significant association was found for aHEI-2010. A 5-year lag analysis yielded similar results. DASH remained associated with reduced hypertension risk even after adjusting for pre-existing diabetes, dyslipidemia, and cardiovascular disease history. The association between DASH and hypertension risk was not evident in long-term survivors (≥15 years post-diagnosis). A stricter hypertension definition (BP ≥130/80 mmHg) did not materially change the findings. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that higher diet quality, particularly following DASH dietary patterns is associated with reduced risk of hypertension in women cancer survivors.

Article Details

Journal Circulation
Volume / Issue Vol. 151, Issue Suppl_1
Published March 11, 2025
ISSN 0009-7322
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Circulation

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0009-7322 Health Sciences

Authors (9)

Y

Yong-Moon Park

N

Nithya Neelakantan

University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, United States

S

Susan Steck

University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, United States

H

Hazel Nichols

University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States

K

Katie OBrien

National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, United States

M

Michael Fradley

Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia (M.F.).

M

Mario Schootman

University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, United States

B

Benjamin Amick

University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, United States

D

Dale Sandler

National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, United States