Abstract P2088: Impact Of Geographic Residence And Treatment Modality On Mortality Outcomes Among Adult Patients Diagnosed With Acute Myocardial Infarction

C Carlton Smith (UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, United States) L Liou Xu G Gary Puckrein D Demilade Adedinsewo D Debra Dixon (Vanderbilt University Medical Ctr, Nashville, Tennessee, United States) N Norrisa Haynes (Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, United States) A Anekwe Onwuanyi (Morehouse School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, United States) O Oladipupo Olafiranye (VA North Texas Health Care System, Dallas, Texas, United States)

Abstract

Background: In the United States, rural residents face unique challenges that affect their overall cardiovascular health and mortality including access to care for acute cardiovascular conditions. We assessed differences in mortality and mode of care among adult patients diagnosed with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) based on geographical residence. Methods: Using data from the Medicare Provider Analysis and Review files, we identified adult patients aged 45 and older who were diagnosed with AMI between 2015 and 2019. Cox-proportional hazards regression models were constructed to determine the association between patient’s geographic residence (rural vs. urban) on 30- and 90-day all-cause mortality. Results: A total of 868,955 adult patients diagnosed with AMI were included in this study. Twenty-six percent of the sample resided in rural areas. Among rural residents with AMI, 46% were managed invasively with either percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery which was similar to 45% of urban residents. After controlling for age, race, sex, and comorbid conditions, rural residents had a higher risk of death compared to urban patients (aHR 1.04, p<0.001) at 30 and 90 days. In subgroup analyses, a similar pattern was observed among those who did not undergo invasive procedures (aHR 1.06, p<0.001), however, there was no differences in mortality at 30 days (aHR 0.99, p=0.30) and 90 days (aHR: 0.99, p=0.36) between rural and urban residents who were managed by PCI or CABG. Conclusion: Rural patients with AMI had a higher mortality risk than their urban counterparts, and this difference was driven by a higher death rate among those managed conservatively. Further investigation is needed to understand the underlying factors driving rural-urban disparities in mortality, particularly with non-invasive management of AMI.

Article Details

Journal Circulation
Volume / Issue Vol. 151, Issue Suppl_1
Published March 11, 2025
ISSN 0009-7322
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Circulation

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0009-7322 Health Sciences

Authors (8)

C

Carlton Smith

UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, United States

L

Liou Xu

G

Gary Puckrein

D

Demilade Adedinsewo

D

Debra Dixon

Vanderbilt University Medical Ctr, Nashville, Tennessee, United States

N

Norrisa Haynes

Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, United States

A

Anekwe Onwuanyi

Morehouse School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, United States

O

Oladipupo Olafiranye

VA North Texas Health Care System, Dallas, Texas, United States