Abstract MPWE41: Association of better adherence to the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension with all-cause mortality and food groups driving this association: data from a large population-based study from Germany

P Paula Stuermer (Institute of Epidemiology, Kiel University, Kiel, Germany, Kiel, Germany) C Cara Oevermoehle (Institute of Epidemiology, Kiel University, Kiel, Germany, Kiel, Germany) E Eike Strathmann (Institute of Epidemiology, Kiel University, Kiel, Germany, Kiel, Germany) M Max Jaber (Institute of Epidemiology, Kiel University, Kiel, Germany, Kiel, Germany) S Sabrina Schlesinger U Ute Noethlings (Institute of Nutrition and Food Sciences, Nutritional Epidemiology, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany) J Jakob Linseisen M Matthias Schulze (German Institute of Human Nutrition Potsdam-Rehbruecke, Germany, Nuthetal, Germany) T Tobias Pischon M Michael Leitzmann (Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany) M Marcus Doerr K Kristin Lehnert S Sven Knueppel (Department Food and Feed Safety in the Food Chain, German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment, Berlin, Germany) N Nina Wawro (Institute of Epidemiology, University Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany) K Katharina Weber (Department of Cellular Biophysics Max Planck Institute for Medical Research Jahnstrasse 29 D‐69120 Heidelberg Germany) W Wolfgang Lieb

Abstract

Background: Human nutrition is tightly linked to health and disease and, as such, to longevity. Consequently, high adherence to a healthy diet, such as the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH), has repeatedly been associated with a reduced mortality risk. However, the contribution of individual score components driving this association is incompletely understood. Objectives: We assessed the association of adherence to the DASH score as well as its individual components to all-cause mortality in the largest German population-based study, the German National Cohort (NAKO). Methods: We included n=131,486 individuals from the NAKO baseline examination (51.3% women, mean age 49.6 (±12.6) years). Dietary intake was assessed with a multiple source method combining up to four 24h dietary recalls with a self-administered, validated Food Frequency Questionnaire. DASH score was derived based on quintiles of consumption scoring fruits, vegetables, legumes/nuts, wholegrains, and low-fat dairy products positively, while scoring red/processed meat, soft drink, and sodium intake negatively. Cox proportional hazards regression models, adjusted for age, sex, body mass index, smoking, socioeconomic status, physical activity, alcohol, and total daily energy intake, were used to relate DASH adherence to all-cause mortality. Furthermore, we related individual components of DASH (per 1-portion increment) to all-cause mortality. Results: Over a mean follow-up time of 6 (±2) years, n=2,058 participants died. In multivariable-adjusted models, better adherence to DASH was associated with a reduced risk of all-cause mortality (HR: 0.88 [95% CI: 0.84; 0.91] per 5-point increment). When relating individual score components to all-cause mortality, we particularly observed a reduced mortality risk associated with the positively-scored food groups ‘vegetables’ (HR: 0.83 [95% CI: 0.74; 0.93] per 100g increment) and ‘legumes/nuts’ (HR: 0.85 [95% CI: 0.73; 0.92] per 25g increment), while the negatively-scored food groups ‘red/processed meat’ (HR: 1.57 [95% CI: 1.29; 1.92] per 100 g increment) and ‘sodium’ (HR: 1.57 [95% CI: 1.36; 1.83]) were associated with an increased mortality risk. Conclusion: Better adherence to DASH is associated with a reduced risk of all-cause mortality in a large sample from the German general population, with higher intake of vegetables, legumes, and nuts and lower intake of red/processed meat and sodium possibly having a particularly protective effect.

Article Details

Journal Circulation
Volume / Issue Vol. 153, Issue Suppl_1
Published March 24, 2026
ISSN 0009-7322
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Circulation

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0009-7322 Health Sciences

Authors (16)

P

Paula Stuermer

Institute of Epidemiology, Kiel University, Kiel, Germany, Kiel, Germany

C

Cara Oevermoehle

Institute of Epidemiology, Kiel University, Kiel, Germany, Kiel, Germany

E

Eike Strathmann

Institute of Epidemiology, Kiel University, Kiel, Germany, Kiel, Germany

M

Max Jaber

Institute of Epidemiology, Kiel University, Kiel, Germany, Kiel, Germany

S

Sabrina Schlesinger

U

Ute Noethlings

Institute of Nutrition and Food Sciences, Nutritional Epidemiology, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany

J

Jakob Linseisen

M

Matthias Schulze

German Institute of Human Nutrition Potsdam-Rehbruecke, Germany, Nuthetal, Germany

T

Tobias Pischon

M

Michael Leitzmann

Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany

M

Marcus Doerr

K

Kristin Lehnert

S

Sven Knueppel

Department Food and Feed Safety in the Food Chain, German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment, Berlin, Germany

N

Nina Wawro

Institute of Epidemiology, University Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany

K

Katharina Weber

Department of Cellular Biophysics Max Planck Institute for Medical Research Jahnstrasse 29 D‐69120 Heidelberg Germany

W

Wolfgang Lieb