Abstract MP44: Plasma Proteomic Signature Of BMI Reveals Heterogeneous Cardiometabolic Risk Profiles Within And Across Standard BMI Classifications

K Kiani Jacobs (University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, United States) E Eric Leszczynski (Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, United States) J Jacob Barber (Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Ctr, Boston, Massachusetts, United States) P Prashant Rao (Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Ctr, Boston, Massachusetts, United States) M Michael Mi (Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Ctr, Boston, Massachusetts, United States) P Prasun Dev (University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, United States) M Matthew Herzig (Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Cente, Boston, Massachusetts, United States) S Sujoy Ghosh C Clary Clish C Claude Bouchard (PENNINGTON BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH CTR, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, United States) J Jeremy Robbins R Robert Gerszten M Mark Sarzynski (University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, United States)

Abstract

Background: The proteome is altered in obesity and proteomic signatures of BMI have been identified. However, few studies have examined differences in clinical profiles between actual and protein-predicted BMI. Hypothesis: Plasma protein-based BMI classification will better capture cardiometabolic risk compared to actual BMI classification. Methods: Data on cardiometabolic phenotypes and plasma proteins (4979 proteins via SomaScan) were available in 645 adults (56% Female, 35% Black, 17-65 yrs) from the HERITAGE Family Study. LASSO regression models with 10-fold-cross-validation were used to create a BMI proteomic signature. Protein-predicted BMI was classified into weight classes and compared to actual BMI classification to create 7 groups (underpredicted, matched, or overpredicted) ( Fig 1A ). General linear models adjusted for age, sex, race, and measured BMI were used to examine differences in cardiometabolic traits across groups. Results: The LASSO model (R 2 =0.82, RMSE=2.2) included 208 proteins. Protein-predicted BMI correlated with actual BMI at r=0.95 (p<0.0001), with a 16% misclassification rate ( Fig 1A ). Participants whose proteins underpredicted BMI class generally had more favorable cardiometabolic profiles than matched groups of the same class, while overpredicted BMI class groups showed worse cardiometabolic profiles than matched groups of the same class ( Fig 1B ). Conclusions: We identified individuals matched for BMI but with opposing proteomic signatures that differed in cardiometabolic risk profiles. Proteomic profiling may identify clinically meaningful heterogeneity in cardiometabolic health not fully captured by BMI that could potentially be used as biomarkers and/or targets of therapeutic responsiveness.

Article Details

Journal Circulation
Volume / Issue Vol. 151, Issue Suppl_1
Published March 11, 2025
ISSN 0009-7322
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Circulation

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0009-7322 Health Sciences

Authors (13)

K

Kiani Jacobs

University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, United States

E

Eric Leszczynski

Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, United States

J

Jacob Barber

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Ctr, Boston, Massachusetts, United States

P

Prashant Rao

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Ctr, Boston, Massachusetts, United States

M

Michael Mi

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Ctr, Boston, Massachusetts, United States

P

Prasun Dev

University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, United States

M

Matthew Herzig

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Cente, Boston, Massachusetts, United States

S

Sujoy Ghosh

C

Clary Clish

C

Claude Bouchard

PENNINGTON BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH CTR, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, United States

J

Jeremy Robbins

R

Robert Gerszten

M

Mark Sarzynski

University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, United States