Abstract 58: Clinical and Biomarker Subtypes of Preeclampsia and Future Cardiovascular Health

A Anum Minhas (Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States) B Bhargava Chinni (Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States) C Cedric Manlhiot C Chiadi Ndumele (JOHNS HOPKINS HOSPITAL, Silver Spring, Maryland, United States) A Amelia Wallace (JH Bloomberg Sch. of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, United States) T Theresa Boyer (Johns Hopkins University, Wayne, Pennsylvania, United States) W William Grobman (Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, United States) C CN Merz (Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, United States) G George Saade (Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, Virginia, United States) P Philip Greenland (FEINBERG SCH OF MEDICINE, Chicago, Illinois, United States) L Lisa Levine (University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States) N Nathan Vandergrift (RTI International, Research Triangle, North Carolina, United States) L Lynn Yee (Northwestern, Chicago, Illinois, United States) C Caroline Rouse (Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana, United States) A Ashten Waks (University of California Irvine, Irvine, California, United States) S Sadiya Khan (Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, United States) J Janet Catov (UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States)

Abstract

Background: Preeclampsia is a leading cause of maternal-fetal morbidity and strongly linked to future cardiovascular disease. Prediction and prevention remain limited, in part due to preeclampsia heterogeneity and poorly defined biological subtypes. Better delineation of preeclampsia subtypes could inform strategies to reduce preeclampsia and its short- and long-term morbidity. We aimed to identify novel clinical and biomarker defined subtypes of preeclampsia using unsupervised machine learning and evaluate their associations with postpartum cardiovascular health. Methods: Participants with preeclampsia, defined per ACOG criteria, were identified from the multicenter, prospective Nulliparous Pregnancy Outcomes Study: Monitoring Mothers-to-Be (NuMoM2b)-Heart Health Study. Participants with pre-pregnancy hypertension were excluded. Clinical and demographic data, placental and cardiovascular biomarkers, and proteomic profiles were analyzed. Two-stage feature selection (Boruta SHAP and volcano filtering) identified informative proteomic markers, integrated with clinical variables. UMAP dimensionality reduction and Gaussian Mixture Model clustering (optimized by silhouette scores) identified subtypes, followed by refinement to maximize between-cluster variance. The resulting subgroups represented phenotypically and biologically distinct preeclampsia endotypes. Postpartum incident hypertension (>=130/80 mmHg or medication use at 2-7 years) was compared across subtypes using modified Poisson regression. Results: Among 298 women with preeclampsia, three subtypes emerged (Figure 1): (1) cardiometabolic – higher body mass index, blood pressure, and maternal inflammatory markers; (2) placentally-mediated – elevated placental analytes and normal maternal cardiometabolic features; and (3) mixed – intermediate cardiometabolic and placental analyte profiles. All subtypes showed high risk of incident hypertension versus women without adverse pregnancy outcomes (n=755). Risk was highest in the cardiometabolic subtype (RR 3.09 [95%CI 2.39-3.97]), followed by placentally mediated (RR 1.97 [1.43-2.73]) and mixed (RR 1.62 [0.98-2.67]) (global Wald test p<0.001; Figure 2). Conclusion: Preeclampsia comprises biologically distinct subtypes with heightened but differential postpartum cardiovascular risk. Recognition of this heterogeneity provides new insights into pathophysiology and may advance precision prevention of preeclampsia and its long-term cardiovascular sequelae.

Article Details

Journal Circulation
Volume / Issue Vol. 153, Issue Suppl_1
Published March 24, 2026
ISSN 0009-7322
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Circulation

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0009-7322 Health Sciences

Authors (17)

A

Anum Minhas

Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States

B

Bhargava Chinni

Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States

C

Cedric Manlhiot

C

Chiadi Ndumele

JOHNS HOPKINS HOSPITAL, Silver Spring, Maryland, United States

A

Amelia Wallace

JH Bloomberg Sch. of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, United States

T

Theresa Boyer

Johns Hopkins University, Wayne, Pennsylvania, United States

W

William Grobman

Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, United States

C

CN Merz

Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, United States

G

George Saade

Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, Virginia, United States

P

Philip Greenland

FEINBERG SCH OF MEDICINE, Chicago, Illinois, United States

L

Lisa Levine

University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

N

Nathan Vandergrift

RTI International, Research Triangle, North Carolina, United States

L

Lynn Yee

Northwestern, Chicago, Illinois, United States

C

Caroline Rouse

Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

A

Ashten Waks

University of California Irvine, Irvine, California, United States

S

Sadiya Khan

Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, United States

J

Janet Catov

UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States