Abstract 57: Optimizing the Number of Measurements Needed for Reliable Home Blood Pressure Assessment: The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study
Abstract
Introduction: The 2025 AHA/ACC High Blood Pressure (BP) Guidelines recommend home BP monitoring (HBPM) to confirm hypertension diagnosis, guide therapy, and support long-term control. However, the optimal number of HBPM measurements needed for accurate and reliable assessment is not established. Hypothesis: We hypothesized that repeated HBPM, when based on multiple readings per session, would plateau within 3 days. Methods: At ARIC study visit 10 (2021-23) participants completed 8 days of HBPM with two daily sessions (morning and evening) each consisting of 3 readings taken at 1-minute intervals after 5-minutes of rest using an Omron Series 10 BP7450 monitor. We assessed agreement between the 8-day mean (reference) and shorter protocols (fewer days, <3 readings per session, or only morning or evening measurements) using concordance correlation coefficients (CCC) and the proportion of participants with a <10 mm Hg difference from the reference. We then evaluated whether the number of days to reach BP stability (average systolic BP [SBP] and diastolic BP [DBP] <5 mm Hg from reference) differed by age, sex, and anti-hypertensive medication use. Results: Among 812 participants (median age 83 years, 24% Black adults, 40% male), 29% had normal BP during the study visit, and 84% were on anti-hypertensive medications ( Table ). Median SBP and DBP remained within a 2 mm Hg range across each day of the 8-day protocol. Using cumulative averages, the largest improvement in agreement occurred when extending the averaging window from 1 to 2 days, with the CCC increasing for SBP from 0.856 (95% CI: 0.837, 0.873) to 0.929 (0.919, 0.937) and for DBP from 0.846 (0.826, 0.864) to 0.929 (0.919, 0.938) ( Figure 1 ). With 3 days of HBPM, the CCC exceeded 0.95 and the proportion of participants within 10 mm Hg difference achieved ≥97% for both SBP and DBP. Beyond 4 days, agreement metrics plateaued. Averaging ≥2 readings per session, including both morning and evening measurements, yielded better agreement than using a single reading or only one timepoint per day. On average, using 3 readings per session, BP stabilized in 1.28 (1.24, 1.33) days, with results similar within subgroups ( Figure 2 ). Conclusions: In this community-based cohort of very old adults, HBPM provided stable BP estimates within 2-3 days (morning and evening sessions with 2-3 readings each). These findings support shorter HBPM protocols to guide hypertension management while reducing burden in older adults.
Article Details
Authors (17)
Frances Wang
Beth Israel Deaconess Med Center, Diamond Bar, California, United States
Hannah Col
BIDMC, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Fredrick Larbi
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Ctr, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Dhrumil Patil
Md Marufuzzaman Khan
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Cente, Brookline, Massachusetts, United States
Long Ngo
Jennifer Cluett
BIDMC-Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Elizabeth Selvin
Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore
Lynne Wagenknecht
Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States
Timothy Hughes
B Gwen Windham
UMMC, The MIND Center, Jackson, Mississippi, United States
Thomas Mosley
UNIV MS MEDICAL CTR, Jackson, Mississippi, United States
Pamela Lutsey
University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
Kimberly Ring
UNC - Biostatistics, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States
Arielle Valint
UNC- Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States
Mingyu Zhang
Hubei Key Laboratory of Electrochemical Power Sources, College of Chemistry and Molecular Sciences
Stephen Juraschek
BIDMC-Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States