Abstract 4372843: Cognitive Impairment in Heart Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Prevalence and Predictors

K Karthik Chintharala (NRI Academy of Medical Sciences, Vijayawada, India) H Hadassa Evangeline Sekharamahanti (Mercy Catholic Medical Center, Darby, Pennsylvania, United States) V Varsha Miriyala (University of Miami Miller school of Medicine, Miami, Florida, United States) S SAI TAPASVI MADAM (G.S.L Medical College, Rajahmundry, Andhra Pradesh, India)

Abstract

Background: Cognitive impairment (CI) is increasingly recognized as a critical comorbidity in patients with heart failure (HF), contributing to medication nonadherence, readmissions, and mortality. However, its true prevalence and determinants remain unclear. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to quantify the prevalence of CI in HF and identify key clinical predictors. Methods: We followed PRISMA guidelines and searched PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, and Cochrane databases through April 2024 using terms: (“cognitive dysfunction” OR “cognitive impairment”) AND (“heart failure” OR “cardiac dysfunction”). Studies were included if they: (1) enrolled adult HF patients; (2) assessed CI using validated tools (e.g., MoCA, MMSE); and (3) reported prevalence or correlations with clinical variables. Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed risk of bias. Pooled prevalence estimates and odds ratios (ORs) were calculated using a random-effects model (DerSimonian–Laird method). Results: Of 1,147 screened articles, 26 met inclusion criteria (n=6,328 HF patients; mean age 69±9 years). The pooled prevalence of CI in HF was 42% (95% CI: 36–48%, I = 72%). Subgroup analysis revealed higher prevalence in HF with reduced EF (HFrEF) (48%) compared to preserved EF (HFpEF) (35%, p<0.01). Severe LV dysfunction (LVEF <30%) was associated with increased risk of CI (OR 1.92; 95% CI: 1.43–2.59), as were elevated NT-proBNP (OR 1.71) and age >75 (OR 2.14). Cognitive domains most affected included executive function and visuospatial processing. Funnel plot asymmetry was minimal (Egger’s p = 0.11). Conclusion: CI affects over 40% of HF patients, with greater burden in HFrEF and elderly subgroups. Clinical predictors such as reduced LVEF, age, and NT-proBNP may aid early identification. These findings highlight the need for routine cognitive screening and integration of cognitive assessment into HF care models to improve adherence and outcomes.

Article Details

Journal Circulation
Volume / Issue Vol. 152, Issue Suppl_3
Published November 04, 2025
ISSN 0009-7322
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Circulation

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0009-7322 Health Sciences

Authors (4)

K

Karthik Chintharala

NRI Academy of Medical Sciences, Vijayawada, India

H

Hadassa Evangeline Sekharamahanti

Mercy Catholic Medical Center, Darby, Pennsylvania, United States

V

Varsha Miriyala

University of Miami Miller school of Medicine, Miami, Florida, United States

S

SAI TAPASVI MADAM

G.S.L Medical College, Rajahmundry, Andhra Pradesh, India