Abstract 4372327: Preoperative Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump Use and Surgical Outcomes in Acute Mitral Regurgitation

A Abdul Rasheed Bahar (Wayne State University, Dearborn, Michigan, United States) Y Yasemin Bahar (Wayne State University, Dearborn, Michigan, United States) V Vaishnavi Sirekulam (Wayne State University, Dearborn, Michigan, United States) M Mohamed Elhussain (Wayne State University, Dearborn, Michigan, United States) M Mohamad Hasan Jawadi (Wayne State University, Dearborn, Michigan, United States) M M Chadi Alraies (Detroit Medical Center, Detroit, Michigan, United States)

Abstract

Background: Acute mitral regurgitation (MR) is a critical condition that often necessitates urgent surgical intervention. While intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) therapy is recommended as a bridge to surgery in select cases, evidence supporting its clinical utility in this setting remains limited. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the Nationwide Readmissions Database (NRD) from 2016 to 2020. Adult patients undergoing surgical correction for acute MR were identified using ICD-10-CM/PCS codes. Propensity score matching was performed to compare outcomes between patients who received preoperative IABP and those who did not. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included in-hospital complications, 30- , 90-, and 180-day readmissions, and resource utilization. Results: Of 33,644 hospitalizations for surgical repair of acute MR, 1,691 (5.0%) received preoperative IABP. After 1:1 matching, 918 patient pairs were analyzed. IABP use was associated with significantly lower in-hospital mortality (2.8% vs. 6.0%, p < 0.001), cardiogenic shock (12.9% vs. 18%, p < 0.001), myocardial infarction (1.7% vs. 9.9%, p < 0.001), MACCE (16.4% vs. 22.4%, p < 0.001), acute kidney injury (28.5% vs. 51.0%, p < 0.001), stroke (0.2% vs. 2.6%, p < 0.001), and need for endotracheal intubation (5.5% vs. 20.2%, p < 0.001). The IABP group had a shorter median hospital stay (10 vs. 13 days, p < 0.001), but higher hospitalization costs ($83,118 vs. $49,343, p < 0.001). Thirty-day readmission was significantly lower in the IABP group (8.3% vs. 11.7%, p = 0.02), with no differences at 90 or 180 days. Conclusion: In patients undergoing surgery for acute MR, preoperative IABP use was associated with improved in-hospital outcomes and lower 30-day readmission rates, despite higher resource utilization. These findings support a potential therapeutic role for IABP as a bridging strategy in this high-risk population and warrant validation through prospective studies.

Article Details

Journal Circulation
Volume / Issue Vol. 152, Issue Suppl_3
Published November 04, 2025
ISSN 0009-7322
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Circulation

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0009-7322 Health Sciences

Authors (6)

A

Abdul Rasheed Bahar

Wayne State University, Dearborn, Michigan, United States

Y

Yasemin Bahar

Wayne State University, Dearborn, Michigan, United States

V

Vaishnavi Sirekulam

Wayne State University, Dearborn, Michigan, United States

M

Mohamed Elhussain

Wayne State University, Dearborn, Michigan, United States

M

Mohamad Hasan Jawadi

Wayne State University, Dearborn, Michigan, United States

M

M Chadi Alraies

Detroit Medical Center, Detroit, Michigan, United States