Abstract 4371733: Exercise versus Regadenoson for Myocardial Perfusion Assessment in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

O Olivia Nguyen (OREGON HEALTH SCIENCE UNIVERSITY, Portland, Oregon, United States) J James Hodovan (OREGON HEALTH SCIENCE UNIVERSITY, Portland, Oregon, United States) M Mohammad Alqabani (OREGON HEALTH SCIENCE UNIVERSITY, Portland, Oregon, United States) D Daniel Kamna (OREGON HEALTH SCIENCE UNIVERSITY, Portland, Oregon, United States) I Israt Jahan B Brian Davidson (OREGON HEALTH SCIENCE UNIVERSITY, Portland, Oregon, United States) A Ahmad Masri (Oregon Health and Science University, Portland)

Abstract

Background: Despite limited supporting evidence, adenosine-based vasodilators have become the default stress test agents in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), where perfusion defects have been reported at higher-than-expected rates, with some studies showing 100% perfusion deficits in apical HCM. Aims: To elucidate the prevalence and mechanism of perfusion defects in HCM by performing a head-to-head comparison of physiologic stressors against supraphysiologic stressors and isolate the effect of myocyte hypercontractility on myocardial perfusion using a subgroup of patients on cardiac myosin inhibitors (CMIs). Methods: This is a prospective study of 25 patients with HCM. Participants underwent myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE) during maximal effort supine bicycle, followed by a period of rest, then regadenoson MCE. Quantitative perfusion analysis with NarNar software derived myocardial blood volume, microvascular blood flux rate, myocardial blood flow (MBF), and coronary flow reserve (CFR). Results: The study is ongoing, 22 patients successfully underwent the study protocol, exercised to exhaustion or limiting symptoms (all participants exercised for ≥6 minutes, reaching ≥100 peak watts). A total of 11 patients (50%) were symptomatic in daily living with NYHA class II-III. MCE was able to reproduce symptoms in patients, but symptom burden was significantly higher with regadenoson (96%) compared to exercise (59%), p=<0.001. Perfusion analysis has been completed for 11 patients and is ongoing. For the 11 patients, during exercise stress, MBF increased from a mean of 97±49 to 197±178 mL/min/g (CFR 2.2±1.6), while regadenoson stress increased MBF from a mean of 99±60 to 132±76 mL/min/g (CFR 1.5±1.0). In the CMI subgroup, mean CFR was 2.4±1.9 with exercise and 1.9±1.1 with regadenoson, while the non-CMI group had a mean of 1.9±1.0 with exercise and 0.9±0.4 with regadenoson. Conclusion: Preliminary findings suggest that regadenoson, as compared to exercise, overestimates myocardial perfusion defects in HCM, results in frequently impaired CFR (<2.0), and causes frequent symptomatology not reflective of patients’ daily symptoms. These results support reevaluating the routine use of supraphysiologic vasodilators in HCM stress testing. Furthermore, CMI use led to higher CFR values, supporting our hypothesis that alleviation of myocyte hypercontractility may improve perfusion in HCM patients. Further experiments are being conducted to confirm our findings.

Article Details

Journal Circulation
Volume / Issue Vol. 152, Issue Suppl_3
Published November 04, 2025
ISSN 0009-7322
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Circulation

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0009-7322 Health Sciences

Authors (7)

O

Olivia Nguyen

OREGON HEALTH SCIENCE UNIVERSITY, Portland, Oregon, United States

J

James Hodovan

OREGON HEALTH SCIENCE UNIVERSITY, Portland, Oregon, United States

M

Mohammad Alqabani

OREGON HEALTH SCIENCE UNIVERSITY, Portland, Oregon, United States

D

Daniel Kamna

OREGON HEALTH SCIENCE UNIVERSITY, Portland, Oregon, United States

I

Israt Jahan

B

Brian Davidson

OREGON HEALTH SCIENCE UNIVERSITY, Portland, Oregon, United States

A

Ahmad Masri

Oregon Health and Science University, Portland