Abstract 4371631: Adverse events profile of Transthyretin stabilizers in Transthyretin Amyloid Cardiomyopathy - A Meta-Analysis of randomised control trials
Abstract
Background: Transthyretin Amyloid Cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM) is a progressive infiltrative cardiomyopathy with significant morbidity and mortality. Transthyretin (TTR) stabilizers such as Tafamidis and Acoramidis are reported to have increased clinical benefits; however, comparison of safety profiles remains limited. Thus, comparing their adverse event profile is essential for long-term treatment strategies. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL for randomized controlled trials comparing tafamidis or acoramidis with placebo in patients with ATTR-CM. Two trials met inclusion criteria. Data were extracted for treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), serious adverse events (SAEs), discontinuation due to TEAEs, cardiac TEAEs, cardiac failure, and atrial fibrillation. Pooled analysis was performed using the inverse variance method with a random-effects model in RevMan. Risk ratios, risk differences, confidence intervals, and forest plots were generated. Results: Two RCTs were included. The incidence of any TEAE was comparable between TTR stabilizers and placebo (RR=1.00, 95% CI: 0.98–1.02, p=0.99), suggesting no increase in overall adverse events. TTR stabilizers were associated with a significant reduction in serious adverse events (RD=–0.07, 95% CI: –0.14 to –0.00, p=0.04), with a number needed to treat (NNT) of 14. Cardiac failure-related events were also significantly lower with treatment (RD=–0.10, 95% CI: –0.20 to –0.00, p=0.04), corresponding to an NNT of 10. No statistically significant differences were observed in discontinuations due to TEAEs , overall cardiac TEAEs, and atrial fibrillation. Conclusion: TTR stabilizers showed a favorable safety profile in ATTR-CM, with reduced rates of serious and cardiac failure-related adverse events and no increase in overall TEAEs. These findings support their clinical safety; however, limited study numbers and sample sizes warrant cautious interpretation and highlight the need for further research.
Article Details
Authors (2)
Naga Alekhya Garikipati
Mediciti Institue Of Medical Scienc, Hyderabad, India
Anjani Mahesh Kumar Cherukuri
Guntur Medical College, India, Guntur , India