Abstract 4371458: Determining the Impact of Long-term Ventricular Assist Device Use Prior to Heart Transplantation in Adolescents and Young Adults

Z Zoe Cook (Texas A&M University School of Medicine, College Station, Texas, United States) S Stephanie Philip (UT Dell Med School -Dell Childrens, Austin, Texas, United States) H Hugo Martinez (UT Dell Med School -Dell Childrens, Austin, Texas, United States) L Lauren Glass (UT Dell Med School -Dell Childrens, Austin, Texas, United States) C Chesney Castleberry (UT Dell Med School -Dell Childrens, Austin, Texas, United States)

Abstract

Background: Ventricular assist devices (VADs) are pivotal in advanced heart-failure care for adolescents and young adults (AYA), serving primarily as bridges to heart transplantation (HTx). In pediatrics, VADs increasingly replace extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), improving hemodynamics, organ perfusion, survival, and recovery. The optimal support duration remains unclear; adult studies conflict, with some linking >1 year of support to poorer post-HTx survival and others finding no effect. This study evaluates whether VAD duration (<90 d vs ≥90 d) independently influences post-HTx outcomes in AYA. Methods: A retrospective review of the OPTN Standard Transplant Analysis Research dataset was done between May 2000 and June 2024. All AYA patients, between the ages of 10-30 years, that were at any time of VAD support prior to HTx, were isolated and compared based on length of time on support. AYA on VAD support for ≥90 days prior to HTx were considered long-term VADs, and AYA with VAD <90 days prior to HTx were considered short-term VADs. These populations were identified and compared for demographics and outcomes. Results: We were able to isolate 2,169 cases, 1,171 patients who were on VAD support for ≥90 days prior to HTx and 998 patients who were on VAD support for <90 days prior to HTx. Both cohorts showed similarities but were statistically significant in that AYA who had a VAD > 90 days were more likely to be older, have longer time on the waitlist, and have longer time of available follow-up (p < .0001, p <.0001, p = .0005 respectively). Our initial time-to-event analysis showed a statistically significant difference in outcomes, with AYA who had long-term VADs having a higher likelihood of mortality and graft failure. However, when controlling for age, VAD type, race, ethnicity, and gender our Cox variable regression model showed no significant difference between graft failure or mortality in these two cohorts (p = .2252, p = .2523, respectively). Conclusions: Optimal timing for heart transplant listing after VAD implant in AYA remains elusive. While post-HTx events were higher in those with longer days of support, VAD duration was not significant on multivariable analysis. Further study in specific populations is needed to determine optimal timing of listing in those with durable support.

Article Details

Journal Circulation
Volume / Issue Vol. 152, Issue Suppl_3
Published November 04, 2025
ISSN 0009-7322
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Circulation

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0009-7322 Health Sciences

Authors (5)

Z

Zoe Cook

Texas A&M University School of Medicine, College Station, Texas, United States

S

Stephanie Philip

UT Dell Med School -Dell Childrens, Austin, Texas, United States

H

Hugo Martinez

UT Dell Med School -Dell Childrens, Austin, Texas, United States

L

Lauren Glass

UT Dell Med School -Dell Childrens, Austin, Texas, United States

C

Chesney Castleberry

UT Dell Med School -Dell Childrens, Austin, Texas, United States