Abstract 4371287: Elevated Pulse Pressure Is Independently Associated With Increased Risk of Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Anticoagulated Atrial Fibrillation Patients
Abstract
Background: Pulse pressure (PP), the difference between systolic and diastolic blood pressure, reflects arterial stiffness and vascular aging. Its role in predicting gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding risk among anticoagulated atrial fibrillation (AF) patients remains poorly defined. Objective: To assess whether elevated pulse pressure independently predicts GI bleeding in anticoagulated patients with atrial fibrillation. Methods: This retrospective cohort study used the REACHnet database. Adult patients diagnosed with AF and receiving blood thinners were included. PP was derived from outpatient systolic and diastolic measurements and categorized into tertiles: T1 (<46 mmHg), T2 (46–62 mmHg), and T3 (>62 mmHg). The primary outcome was GI bleeding requiring hospitalization. Demographic and clinical variables were compared across tertiles using Wilcoxon tests, t-tests, and Chi-square tests as needed. Kaplan-Meier analysis assessed time to GI bleeding. Cox proportional hazards models were adjusted for confounders, including systolic blood pressure (SBP). Results: Among 3,142 patients (mean age 74 ± 8.9 years; 47% female), 9.9% experienced GI bleeding over a median follow-up of 4.1 years. Patients in the highest PP tertile (T3) had significantly greater prevalence of hypertension, diabetes, peripheral artery disease, history of stroke, and anticoagulant use (all p<0.01) (Table 1). Despite this higher burden of comorbidity, elevated PP remained an independent predictor of GI bleeding. Adjusted analysis showed that patients in T3 had a 48% increased risk of GI bleeding compared to T1 (HR: 1.48; 95% CI: 1.19–1.84; p<0.001), independent of SBP and other clinical factors. Kaplan-Meier curves demonstrated significantly lower bleeding-free survival in T3 (log-rank p=0.003) (Figure 1). Conclusion: High pulse pressure, especially >62 mmHg, is independently associated with GI bleeding in anticoagulated AF patients. This association persists after adjustment for SBP and other comorbidities. PP should be considered in bleeding risk assessment models in clinical practice.
Article Details
Authors (23)
Michel Abou Khalil
Tulane, New Orleans, Louisiana, United States
Christian Massad
Tulane University, New Orleans, Louisiana, United States
Yishi Jia
Tulane Univestiy School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana, United States
Han Feng
School of Chemistry
Yara Menassa
Tulane School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana, United States
ghassan bidaoui
Tulane University, New Orleans, Louisiana, United States
Hadi Younes
Tulane Univestiy School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana, United States
MOHAMMAD MONTASER ATASI
Tulane University, New Orleans, Louisiana, United States
Mayana Bsoul
Tulane University, New Orleans, Louisiana, United States
Tarek Nahle
Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia, United States
Joe Abi-Rached
Tulane Univestiy School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana, United States
Karl Abou Zeid
Saint Joseph University of Beirut, Sin el Fil, Lebanon
Chanho Lim
Tulane University, New Orleans, Louisiana, United States
Radia Ksayer
Tulane University, New Orleans, Louisiana, United States
Abboud Hassan
Tulane School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana, United States
Yingshuo Liu
Tulane Univestiy School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana, United States
Ala' Assaf
Tulane University, New Orleans, Louisiana, United States
Charbel Noujaim
Tulane Univeristy, New Orleans, Louisiana, United States
Mario Mekhael
Tulane Univestiy School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana, United States
Swati Rao
Tulane Univestiy School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana, United States
Omar Kreidieh
Tulane Univestiy School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana, United States
Amitabh Pandey
Tulane Univestiy School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana, United States
Nassir Marrouche
Tulane University School of Medicin, New Orleans, Louisiana, United States