Abstract 4370864: Point-of-care Non-invasive Classification of Elevated Intracardiac Filling Pressures for Congestion Assessment

N Nihar Desai (Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, United States) D David Lin M Marat Fudim (Duke Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, United States) R Robert Gordon (NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, Illinois, United States) A Anjan Tibrewala (Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, United States) J Jaime Hernandez-Montfort (Baylor Scott and White, Temple, Texas, United States) P Patrick McCann (PRISMA Health, Columbia, South Carolina, United States) O Omer Inan (Georgia Institute of Technology, Marietta, Georgia, United States) A Andrew Carek (Cardiosense Inc., Chicago, Illinois, United States) L Liviu Klein (UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, San Francisco, California, United States)

Abstract

Background: Pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) provides an objective assessment of congestion status in heart failure (HF) patients, but its use is limited by the need for an invasive procedure, trained personnel, and specialized equipment to obtain a measurement. Cardiosense (Chicago, IL) has developed a machine learning (ML) algorithm that detects elevated PCWP non-invasively from data acquired by a chest-worn wearable device (CardioTag). We present data for a potential in-clinic point-of-care tool that improves the identification of hemodynamic congestion, with a focus on outpatient and low-acuity settings. Methods: The ePCWP System is a ML model developed to identify elevated PCWP (>18 mmHg) using non-invasive physiological biosignals from the CardioTag device, which simultaneously collects electrocardiogram, seismocardiogram, and photoplethysmogram data. Concurrent CardioTag and right-heart catheterization (RHC) data were collected prospectively in an observational study across 15 US sites from 1,116 patients undergoing standard-of-care RHC. Patients were either diagnosed with HFrEF, HFpEF, HFmrEF, or were suspected of HF before the RHC procedure. Standard of care physical examination, used to evaluate congestion status, was captured and used for comparative analysis. The training dataset contained 726 subjects and the validation dataset contained 153 subjects. Results: Five-fold cross-validation of the training dataset showed an overall accuracy of 0.79, sensitivity of 0.75 (CI: [0.69, 0.80]), and a specificity of 0.81 (CI: [0.77, 0.78]). The validation dataset showed an overall accuracy of 0.81, sensitivity of 0.76 (CI: [0.63, 0.86]), and a specificity of 0.82 (CI: [0.66, 0.89]). Figure 1 shows the overall classification performance of the ePCWP System (left) and a comparison to standard-of-care physical exam (right). Conclusion: We developed a non-invasive point-of-care tool that is capable of providing rapid, accurate assessments of congestion for patients with HF. This tool might be used to support convenient, frequent inpatient monitoring to augment discharge decisions and guide post-discharge follow-up care towards timely interventions and improvements in patient outcomes.

Article Details

Journal Circulation
Volume / Issue Vol. 152, Issue Suppl_3
Published November 04, 2025
ISSN 0009-7322
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Circulation

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0009-7322 Health Sciences

Authors (10)

N

Nihar Desai

Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, United States

D

David Lin

M

Marat Fudim

Duke Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, United States

R

Robert Gordon

NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, Illinois, United States

A

Anjan Tibrewala

Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, United States

J

Jaime Hernandez-Montfort

Baylor Scott and White, Temple, Texas, United States

P

Patrick McCann

PRISMA Health, Columbia, South Carolina, United States

O

Omer Inan

Georgia Institute of Technology, Marietta, Georgia, United States

A

Andrew Carek

Cardiosense Inc., Chicago, Illinois, United States

L

Liviu Klein

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, San Francisco, California, United States