Abstract 4370759: Bariatric Surgery vs. GLP/GIP Agonists: A Real-World Comparative Analysis of Cardiovascular Outcomes in Over 2 Million Patients.
Abstract
This retrospective cohort study utilized the TriNetX Research Network, comprising real-time electronic medical records from over 100 healthcare organizations. Adults (≥18 years) treated between 2021 and 2024 were included if they underwent bariatric surgery or received a GLP/GIP agonist (tirzepatide, semaglutide, liraglutide, or dulaglutide). Patients exposed to both interventions were excluded. Propensity score matching (1:1, greedy nearest neighbor) was used to balance covariates between groups. The analytic window spanned from 90 to 1,095 days post-index. Patients with a prior history of each outcome were excluded. Primary outcomes included mortality, atrial fibrillation (Afib), myocardial infarction (MI), heart failure (HF), and stroke. Risk ratios (RRs), 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and p-values were calculated for each endpoint. Results: The final matched cohorts included 135,863 bariatric patients and 2,070,839 GLP/GIP-treated patients. Bariatric surgery was associated with significantly lower risk of mortality (RR 0.561, 95% CI: 0.524–0.600, p < 0.001), Afib (RR 0.892, 95% CI: 0.828–0.960, p = 0.002), MI (RR 0.605, 95% CI: 0.536–0.684, p < 0.001), and HF (RR 0.578, 95% CI: 0.531–0.630, p < 0.001). Stroke risk was also significantly lower (RR 0.863, 95% CI: 0.801–0.930, p < 0.001). Kaplan-Meier survival analyses confirmed improved event-free survival in the bariatric cohort across all outcomes. Notably, hazard ratios mirrored these findings, with mortality HR 0.365 ( p < 0.001), HF HR 0.440 ( p < 0.001), and MI HR 0.553 ( p < 0.001). Conclusion: In this large real-world analysis, bariatric surgery was associated with significantly lower risks of death, arrhythmias, myocardial infarction, heart failure, and stroke compared to GLP/GIP therapy. These results reinforce the profound cardiometabolic benefits of bariatric surgery and highlight its value as a preferred intervention in eligible patients at high cardiovascular risk.
Article Details
Authors (2)
Oluwamisimi Abib
Piedmont Athens Regional, Athens, Georgia, United States
Endurance Evbayekha
St. Lukes Hospital, Chesterfield, Missouri, United States