Abstract 4370619: When Bigger Isn’t Worse: The Obesity Paradox in Pulmonary Embolism — A Meta-Analysis

S Sawai Singh Rathore (Ascension St. Vincent Hospital Indianapolis (Milwaukee) Program, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States) A Akshat Banga (Mount Auburn Hospital, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States) K Keshav Bhattar (Memorial Healthcare System, Fl, Pembroke Pines, Florida, United States) I Ibrahim Al Shyyab (Southern Illinois University, Springfield, Illinois, United States) A Ashish Yadav M Mahendra Kumar

Abstract

Background: Obesity is a well-established risk factor for venous thromboembolism, including pulmonary embolism (PE). Obese individuals are more likely to develop PE due to prothrombotic and inflammatory states associated with excess adiposity. However, an emerging body of evidence suggests that obese patients may experience unexpectedly favorable outcomes, a phenomenon known as the “obesity paradox.” This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the impact of obesity on clinical outcomes in patients with pulmonary embolism (PE). Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted using PubMed, Embase, and Google Scholar databases. Random-effects models were used to calculate Mantel-Haenszel odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. Review Manager 5.0 (RevMan) was utilized for all statistical analyses. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality from hospitalization till one-year follow-up. Secondary outcomes were major bleeding events in the same time frame. Obesity was defined as a body mass index (BMI) of 30 kg/m2 or greater, as per the World Health Organization (WHO) definition. Results: Seven studies, including 404,348 patients with pulmonary embolism (PE), were included in this analysis. Pooled data showed that obese patients had significantly lower all-cause mortality compared to non-obese patients (RR: 0.69; 95% CI: 0.64–0.74; p < 0.001), supporting the concept of a mortality paradox. Despite concerns that obesity might increase bleeding risk, no statistically significant difference in major bleeding events was observed between obese and non-obese groups (RR: 1.10; 95% CI: 0.70–1.72; p = 0.67). Conclusion: This meta-analysis demonstrates a clear mortality benefit in obese patients with PE without an increased risk of major bleeding, reinforcing the concept of an obesity paradox. Further research is needed to elucidate the underlying mechanisms and to guide risk-adapted management strategies in this population.

Article Details

Journal Circulation
Volume / Issue Vol. 152, Issue Suppl_3
Published November 04, 2025
ISSN 0009-7322
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Circulation

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0009-7322 Health Sciences

Authors (6)

S

Sawai Singh Rathore

Ascension St. Vincent Hospital Indianapolis (Milwaukee) Program, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States

A

Akshat Banga

Mount Auburn Hospital, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States

K

Keshav Bhattar

Memorial Healthcare System, Fl, Pembroke Pines, Florida, United States

I

Ibrahim Al Shyyab

Southern Illinois University, Springfield, Illinois, United States

A

Ashish Yadav

M

Mahendra Kumar