Abstract 4370374: Association of TTR-Targeted Therapies with Cardiovascular Outcomes in Transthyretin Amyloid Cardiomyopathy: A Real-World Analysis
Abstract
Background: Transthyretin Amyloid Cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM) is a progressive, infiltrative disease caused by deposition of misfolded transthyretin (TTR) amyloid fibrils in the myocardium. TTR-targeted therapies, including TTR stabilizers and gene silencers, have shown clinical benefit in randomized clinical trials. However, data on cardiovascular outcomes associated with these therapies in real-world settings remain limited. Methods: This retrospective cohort study utilized electronic health record data from the TriNetX Research Network (2019–2025). Adults with a diagnosis of ATTR-CM were categorized into three groups based on prescription records: TTR stabilizers (e.g., tafamidis, acoramidis), TTR gene silencers (e.g., vutrisiran, eplontersen, patisiran, inotersen), or standard medical therapy. The primary outcome was a composite of ventricular tachycardia (VT), ventricular fibrillation (VF), cardiac arrest, or all-cause mortality. Cox proportional hazards models with inverse probability weighting (IPW) were used to estimate adjusted associations. Results: Among 10,888 patients with ATTR-CM (34.8% female; median age 73 years [IQR 64–80]), 4,301 received a TTR stabilizer, 356 received a TTR gene silencer, and 6,231 were managed with standard therapy. In adjusted analyses using IPW, TTR stabilizer use was associated with a lower risk of the composite outcome compared with standard therapy (HR = 0.81; 95% CI: 0.72–0.92; p = 0.001). A non-significant association was observed for TTR gene silencers relative to standard therapy (HR = 0.81; 95% CI: 0.59–1.12; p = 0.205). (Table 1, Figure 1) Conclusions: In this large, real-world analysis of patients with ATTR-CM, use of TTR stabilizers was associated with a lower incidence of major cardiovascular events compared with standard care. TTR gene silencers showed a similar directional association, though limited by a smaller sample size. These findings support further investigation in prospective studies to better understand the relationship between TTR-targeted therapies and clinical outcomes.
Article Details
Authors (10)
Abdulla Shahid
UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM, Birmingham, Alabama, United States
Akhil Pampana
UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM, Birmingham, Alabama, United States
Mokshad Gaonkar
Nirav Patel
Harshvir Bal
UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM, Birmingham, Alabama, United States
Amrita Nayak
UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM, Birmingham, Alabama, United States
Nehal Vekariya
Naman Shetty
Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Garima Arora
Pankaj Arora