Abstract 4369970: Predictive Value of Coronary Artery Calcification on the baseline PET/CT or Chest CT for MACE and Mortality in Lung Cancer
Abstract
Background: Lung cancer is classified into small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC – including adenocarcinoma, squamous cell, and large cell carcinoma). The incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE)—defined as acute myocardial infarction, acute coronary syndrome/ischemic heart disease requiring revascularization, stroke, and cardiovascular death—have not been well defined in lung cancer patients following treatment. Coronary artery calcifications (CAC) and aortic calcifications (CA) are known cardiovascular risk markers in non-cancer populations. Purpose: To determine whether the presence of CAC or CA, as identified on baseline PET-CT (Positron Emission Tomography–Computed Tomography) or chest CT imaging, is predictive of MACE and all-cause mortality (ACM) in patients with lung cancer. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients diagnosed with SCLC or NSCLC who received chemotherapy, between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2024. The baseline PET-CT or chest CT scans were reviewed for the presence of CAC and/or CA. Patients were excluded if they lacked baseline imaging or had experienced a MACE before treatment. Univariate and multivariate adjusted Cox regression models were employed to assess associations between CAC/CA and MACE or ACM. The Kaplan-Meier survival analyses was performed to evaluate event-free survival. Results: A total of 385 patients were included (mean age: 74 years, IQR: 67–79), predominantly female (158 [55%]) and white (279 [96.2%]). NSCLC was found in 255 (88%) and SCLC in 35 (12%). CAC was identified in 172 (60%) and CA in 87 (30%). Among patients with NSCLC, the presence of CAC was significantly associated with MACE (HR: 2.84 [95% CI: 1.6–4.8], p=0.0001) (Fig. a), particularly in those with adenocarcinoma (Fig. b). In SCLC, (HR: 1.56 [95% CI: 0.1–14.0], p=ns). On multivariable analysis, CAC remained the strongest predictor of MACE after adjusting for age, hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia, and smoking status (HR: 2.6 [95% CI: 1.5–4.4], p=0.0008) (Fig. d). No significant association was found between CA and MACE in either group (p>0.05). ACM was similar for SCLC, squamous cell, and NSCLC (Fig. c). Conclusion: In patients with NSCLC especially lung adenocarcinoma, the presence of CAC in the baseline PET/CT was an independent predictor of MACE. This finding supports the value of CAC as a non-invasive cardiovascular risk marker.
Article Details
Authors (8)
MARIA F. GOMEZ ARDILA
Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Rochester, Minnesota, United States
Eduardo Brenner Muslera
Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Rochester, Minnesota, United States
Maria Jose Perez Nuques
Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Rochester, Minnesota, United States
Eduardo Villa Pallares
Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Rochester, Minnesota, United States
Eduardo Tellez Garcia
Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Rochester, Minnesota, United States
Hector Cajigas
Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States
Thomas Foley
MAYO CLINIC, Rochester, Minnesota, United States
Hector Villarraga
Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Rochester, Minnesota, United States