Abstract 4369930: Disparities in Editorial Leadership of Highly Cited Cardiology Journals by Gender and Country Income Classification

Abstract

Background: Journal editors influence the visibility and direction of scientific research and should have adequate gender and geographic representation. Research Question: Are there disparities in gender and institutional country affiliation among editors of highly cited cardiology and cardiovascular disease journals? Methods: In May 2025, we used Scimago Journal Rankings to identify the 50 top-cited cardiology and cardiovascular disease journals worldwide from 2022 to 2024. Due to the large volume of members, general editorial board listings without defined roles were excluded. Editors’ genders and country of institutional affiliation were extracted independently and in duplicate by eight sub-investigators. An additional sub-investigator resolved any discrepancies. Gender was determined using institutional profiles and publicly available pronouns on academic or professional platforms. Country affiliation was based on the editor’s primary institution and categorized by World Bank income classification 2025, which divides countries into high-income (HIC), upper-middle income (UMIC), lower-middle income (LMIC), and low-income countries (LIC). Key journal characteristics, such as country, impact factor, and article processing charges, were also extracted in duplicate. Results: All 50 top-cited cardiology and cardiovascular disease journals identified were based in HICs. A total of 1,762 editors were included. Most editorial positions were held by men (67%), with women accounting for 28%. One editor was identified as non-binary, and the gender of 91 editors (5%) could not be determined based on publicly available information (Table 1). Pronouns were identifiable for all EIC (n=52), out of which 87% were men (n=45) and 13% were women (n=7). Ninety-five percent of editors were affiliated with institutions based in HIC, while only 5% were based in UMIC (n=71), LMIC (n=16), or LIC (n=5). The most represented countries were the US (41%), Italy (8%), and the UK (7%) (Figure 2). All EICs (100%) were affiliated with institutions based in HICs, mainly the US (52%) and the UK (10%) (Figure 3). Conclusion: Editors of top-cited cardiology journals are predominantly men affiliated with HICs. Diverse editorial leadership in academic cardiology journals is needed to reflect global perspectives in research.