Abstract 4369371: Endocardial to epicardial blood flow ratio predicts the placebo-controlled efficacy of the coronary sinus reducer

M Michael Foley (Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom) M Muhammad Mohsin F Fiyyaz Ahmed-Jushuf (National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, UK (F.A.-J., M.J.F., S.C., C.A.R., D.W., F.A.S., K.M., K.C., S.M., S.S.N., H.S., J.P.H., D.P.F., M.J.S.-S., R.K.A.-L.).) C Christopher Rajkumar (Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom) S Shayna Chotai (National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, UK (F.A.-J., M.J.F., S.C., C.A.R., D.W., F.A.S., K.M., K.C., S.M., S.S.N., H.S., J.P.H., D.P.F., M.J.S.-S., R.K.A.-L.).) F Florentina Simader (Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom) D Danqi Wang J John Davies (Essex Cardiothoracic Centre, Basildon, United Kingdom) T Thomas Keeble (Essex Cardiothoracic Centre, Basildon, United Kingdom) P Peter OKane (University Hospitals of Dorset NHS Foundation Trust, Bournemouth, United Kingdom) T Tushar Kotecha (Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, UK (D.K., T.K.).) S Sukhjinder Nijjer (Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom) R Ricardo Petraco (National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK (C.A.R., M.J.F., F.A.-J., S.C., F.A.S., M.M., A.S., S.G., R.P., G.D.C., J.P.H., D.P.F., M.J.S.-S., R.K.A.-L.).) R Ramzi Khamis (Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom) R Ranil de Silva (Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom) H Hill Jonathan (The Royal Brompton Hospital, London, United Kingdom) C Claudia Cosgrove (St George's Hospital, London, United Kingdom) J James Spratt (St George's Hospital, London, United Kingdom) G Ghada Mikhail (Imperial College NHS Trust, London , United Kingdom) G Graham Cole (Imperial College Healthcare NHS, London, United Kingdom) F Frank Harrell (Vanderbilt, Nashville, Tennessee, United States) J James Howard (Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom) D Darrel Francis (Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom) P Peter Kellman (NIH, BETHESDA, Maryland, United States) M Matthew Shun-Shin (Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom) R Rasha Al-Lamee (National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London)

Abstract

Background: The coronary sinus reducer (CSR) has placebo-controlled evidence of angina benefit from two randomised placebo-controlled trials. The characteristics of patients with most to gain from this therapy remain unknown. Research Question: What is the relationship between endocardial to epicardial blood flow ratio at stress and the placebo-controlled angina response to the CSR? Methods: The Coronary Sinus Reducer Objective Impact on Symptoms, MRI Ischaemia and Microvascular Resistance (ORBITA-COSMIC) trial was a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of the CSR in patients with angina on the maximum tolerated antianginal medication, myocardial ischaemia, epicardial coronary artery disease and no further options for revascularisation. Patients underwent a quantitative adenosine-stress perfusion cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) scan and started daily angina reporting on a smartphone application (ORBITA-app) on enrolment to the trial. At the enrolment CMR, myocardial blood flow (MBF) in all 16 myocardial segments was quantified using an automated perfusion quantification sequence, with further stratification into endocardial and epicardial layers. Patients were randomised in the cardiac catheterisation laboratory to CSR or placebo and entered a 6-month period of blinded follow-up prior to a repeat stress CMR and scheduled unblinding. Results: Enrolment quantified perfusion CMR data were available for 48/51 (94.1%) patients randomised in ORBITA-COSMIC, 22 CSR and 26 placebo (median age 67 (IQR 60 to 73), 42/48 (87.5%) male). The median endocardial to epicardial perfusion ratio (EN:EP) of stress MBF in ischaemic myocardial segments was 0.76 (IQR 0.72 to 0.87). The lower the EN:EP stress MBF, the greater the placebo-controlled improvement with CSR. There was strong evidence that a patient with EN:EP stress MBF in the lower quartile at baseline would have greater placebo-controlled benefit in angina episodes with the CSR than a patient in the upper quartile (EN:EP stress MBF 0.72 versus 0.87, OR 1.26, 95% CrI 1.13 to 1.41, probability of interaction>99.9%). Conclusion: EN:EP stress MBF is the first biological variable which has been shown to predict placebo-controlled benefit with the CSR. This may have a role in the selection of patients for treatment.

Article Details

Journal Circulation
Volume / Issue Vol. 152, Issue Suppl_3
Published November 04, 2025
ISSN 0009-7322
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Circulation

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0009-7322 Health Sciences

Authors (26)

M

Michael Foley

Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom

M

Muhammad Mohsin

F

Fiyyaz Ahmed-Jushuf

National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, UK (F.A.-J., M.J.F., S.C., C.A.R., D.W., F.A.S., K.M., K.C., S.M., S.S.N., H.S., J.P.H., D.P.F., M.J.S.-S., R.K.A.-L.).

C

Christopher Rajkumar

Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom

S

Shayna Chotai

National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, UK (F.A.-J., M.J.F., S.C., C.A.R., D.W., F.A.S., K.M., K.C., S.M., S.S.N., H.S., J.P.H., D.P.F., M.J.S.-S., R.K.A.-L.).

F

Florentina Simader

Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom

D

Danqi Wang

J

John Davies

Essex Cardiothoracic Centre, Basildon, United Kingdom

T

Thomas Keeble

Essex Cardiothoracic Centre, Basildon, United Kingdom

P

Peter OKane

University Hospitals of Dorset NHS Foundation Trust, Bournemouth, United Kingdom

T

Tushar Kotecha

Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, UK (D.K., T.K.).

S

Sukhjinder Nijjer

Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom

R

Ricardo Petraco

National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK (C.A.R., M.J.F., F.A.-J., S.C., F.A.S., M.M., A.S., S.G., R.P., G.D.C., J.P.H., D.P.F., M.J.S.-S., R.K.A.-L.).

R

Ramzi Khamis

Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom

R

Ranil de Silva

Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom

H

Hill Jonathan

The Royal Brompton Hospital, London, United Kingdom

C

Claudia Cosgrove

St George's Hospital, London, United Kingdom

J

James Spratt

St George's Hospital, London, United Kingdom

G

Ghada Mikhail

Imperial College NHS Trust, London , United Kingdom

G

Graham Cole

Imperial College Healthcare NHS, London, United Kingdom

F

Frank Harrell

Vanderbilt, Nashville, Tennessee, United States

J

James Howard

Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom

D

Darrel Francis

Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom

P

Peter Kellman

NIH, BETHESDA, Maryland, United States

M

Matthew Shun-Shin

Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom

R

Rasha Al-Lamee

National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London