Abstract 4369130: Cardiac Sympathetic Denervation, Catheter and Surgical Hybrid Ablation Successfully Treat Refractory Ventricular Arrhythmias – a Comprehensive Heart Team Approach

K Koray Potel (University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States) V Venkatakrishna Tholakanahalli (University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States) F Faris Haddadin (University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States) J Jayden Pham (University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, United States) R Rosemary Kelly

Abstract

Background: Although percutaneous ablation is currently the mainstay of ventricular arrhythmia (VA) management, surgical cardiac sympathetic denervation (CSD) as well as surgical epicardial ablation (SEA) complement the comprehensive management of refractory VA. Hypothesis: Surgical/hybrid interventions can safely and effectively treat refractory VA across the full spectrum of VA etiologies and complexities. Methods: We retrospectively identified 19 patients with refractory VA who underwent CSD and/or SEA, in the form of radiofrequency ablation or intramyocardial direct alcohol injection using thoracoscopy or thoracotomy at a single institution between 2007 and 2024. Patient demographics were collected and correlated with post-operative ventricular tachycardia (VT)-free survival. Results: 19 male patients underwent a surgical/hybrid intervention with a median age 63, 74% non-ischemic VA etiology, average of 2 failed anti-arrhythmic drugs (AAD), average of 2 endocardial and 1 epicardial VT ablations prior to surgery. 13 patients underwent CSD, 4 SEA and 2 both. Three patients were excluded from quantitative analyses due to incomplete data. At one-year post-operative analysis, 75% of patients were free from VT and 81% free from reintervention (Figure 1A). All VT recurrences were seen in CSD-only patients, with all but one occurring within 60 days post-CSD and one late recurrence on day 243. VT-free survival did not differ in patients stratified by VA etiology (non-ischemic vs ischemic, 27% vs 20%, p = 0.612, 1B), number of failed AAD (0-1 vs ≥2, 22% vs 29%, p = 0.89, 1C) or number of prior ablations (0-1 vs ≥2, 10% vs 50%, p = 0.096, 1D). Seattle Heart Failure Model (SHFM) score (mean 0.26 ±0.72) or PAINESD score (mean 8 ±7) did not predict VT-free survival (R 2 = 0.01, p = 0.68 and R 2 = 0.07, p = 0.33 respectively). Conclusions: CSD and SEA are extremely effective in treating refractory VA. CSD might require up to 60 days to take full effect but provides excellent long-term outcomes. Indicators of disease severity did not correlate with clinical success and high-risk patients identified by SHFM and PAINESD scores still benefited from surgical hybrid intervention. This suggests that most patients suffering from refractory VA can benefit from CSD and SEA.

Article Details

Journal Circulation
Volume / Issue Vol. 152, Issue Suppl_3
Published November 04, 2025
ISSN 0009-7322
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Circulation

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0009-7322 Health Sciences

Authors (5)

K

Koray Potel

University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States

V

Venkatakrishna Tholakanahalli

University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States

F

Faris Haddadin

University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States

J

Jayden Pham

University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, United States

R

Rosemary Kelly