Abstract 4368970: Remote Patient Monitoring Lowers Healthcare Expenditures and Utilization in a ACO Cross-Sectional Cohort Study
Abstract
Background: Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs) assume financial risk for total cost of care under value-based payment models and require scalable interventions to reduce high-cost utilization. Remote patient monitoring (RPM) has demonstrated potential to decrease emergency department (ED) visits and hospitalizations in single-disease cohorts, but real-world economic evaluations within fully risk-bearing ACOs remain limited. Hypothesis: We hypothesize that ACO patients enrolled in an RPM program will experience significantly lower per-member-per-month (PMPM) healthcare expenditures, reduced utilization of high-cost services (including ED visits, inpatient admissions, and readmissions) compared to ACO patients not participating in RPM. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of Medicare Fee-for-Service beneficiaries attributed to the Mount Sinai ACO between January and October 2024. Patients with ≥2 structured RPM encounters in Epic (n = 255) were compared to non-RPM controls (n = 4,245) over a 12-month follow-up from each patient’s index date. Outcomes included mean annual claims expense per patient, PMPM costs, and utilization-driven cost components (ED visits, admissions, readmissions, length of stay). Results: RPM participants incurred a mean annual claims expense of $3,223.90 versus $4,333.93 for non-RPM patients, yielding $1,110 (26%) savings per patient-year (p<0.001). On a PMPM basis, costs were $268.66 (RPM) versus $361.16 (non-RPM), for a $92.50 monthly savings (p<0.001). Utilization analyses (per 1,000 patients annually) showed ED visits decreased by 13.3% (452.5 to 392.2), inpatient admissions decreased by 44.7% (198.6 to 109.8), readmissions decreased by 36.0% (24.5 to 15.7), and average length of stay decreased by 11.0% (5.25 to 4.67 days). Preventable ED visits rose by 27.6% (67.4 to 86.0). Conclusions: RPM enrollment was associated with significant reductions in annual and PMPM healthcare expenditures, driven primarily by fewer hospitalizations, and ED visits. These findings support RPM as a scalable, evidence-based strategy to enhance patient engagement and curb avoidable costs under value-based care.
Article Details
Authors (4)
Wesley Smith
HealthSnap, Miami, Florida, United States
Brett Colbert
HealthSnap, Miami, Florida, United States
Olivia Osborne
HealthSnap, Miami, Florida, United States
Craig Flanagan
HealthSnap, Tulane University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, United States