Abstract 4368914: Diagnostic Performance of AI-Assisted Coronary CT Angiography: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Abstract
Background: Coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) is vital for diagnosing ischemic heart disease, yet its accuracy is affected by varying reader expertise. Artificial Intelligence (AI)-driven automated stenosis assessment offers promise for enhancing diagnostic consistency. Aim: We aim to evaluate an AI-CCTA assessment against invasive coronary angiography, invasive FFR, and expert readings. Methods: We performed a comprehensive search in Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE from inception until March 2025. Two independent reviewers screened articles and extracted data on study design, patient demographics, AI methodology, stenosis thresholds, and outcomes. For statistical analysis, we constructed summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curves and used a bivariate random-effects model to derive pooled sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratios (DOR), and area under the curve (AUC). Forest plots were generated to visualize these metrics. Results: Our meta-analysis included 34 studies with 10,067 patients. AI-based CCTA demonstrated excellent diagnostic performance with an AUC of 0.932 for per-patient analysis. The pooled per-patient sensitivity was 0.89 (95% CI: 0.87–0.91) and specificity was 0.80 (95% CI: 0.74–0.86), with a DOR of 37.07 (95% CI: 24.57–55.92). AI validated against expert readers achieved the highest accuracy (0.94, 95% CI: 0.87-0.98). The >70% stenosis threshold demonstrated superior performance (accuracy: 0.89, specificity: 0.96) compared to the >50% threshold (accuracy: 0.86, specificity: 0.87). Per-vessel analysis showed comparable results with an AUC of 0.905. Conclusion: Our meta-analysis confirms that AI-assisted coronary CT angiography delivers high diagnostic performance for coronary stenosis detection, with strong AUC values, high sensitivity and specificity, and robust diagnostic odds ratios across both per-patient and per-vessel assessments.
Article Details
Authors (16)
Abdelrahman Hafez
Cardiology Department, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, United States
Ahmed Sobhy
Mennatullah Ashour
College of Human Medicine, Benha University, Benha, Egypt, Benha, Egypt
Karim Aiash
Jamesville-DeWitt High School, Syracuse, New York, USA, NY, New York, United States
Abdulrahman Aldemerdash
University of Alexandria, Alexandria, Alexandria, Alexandria, Egypt
Amro Mahmoud Radi
New Ahmadi Hospital, Ahmadi, Kuwait, Ahmadi, Kuwait
Amir Elissawy
Touro College of Osteopathic Medicine, NY, New York, United States
khaled zahrawi
Misr University for Science and Technology (MUST), Giza, Egypt, Giza, Egypt
Tawfik Besheya
Faculty of Medicine, University of Tripoli, Tripoli, Libya, Tripoli, Libya
Richard Riccelli
Christian Brothers Academy, Syracuse, New York, USA, NY, New York, United States
Ahmed Elaraby
Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt
Ayaan Arora
Christian Brothers Academy, Syracuse, New York, NY, New York, United States
dina almahmoud
Faculty of Medicine, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Irbid, Jordan
Jessan Jishu
Candidate at Tulane University School of Medicine, New orleans, Louisiana, United States
Eman Toraih
Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana, United States
Hani Aiash
SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, USA, NY, New York, United States