Abstract 4368914: Diagnostic Performance of AI-Assisted Coronary CT Angiography: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

A Abdelrahman Hafez (Cardiology Department, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, United States) A Ahmed Sobhy M Mennatullah Ashour (College of Human Medicine, Benha University, Benha, Egypt, Benha, Egypt) K Karim Aiash (Jamesville-DeWitt High School, Syracuse, New York, USA, NY, New York, United States) A Abdulrahman Aldemerdash (University of Alexandria, Alexandria, Alexandria, Alexandria, Egypt) A Amro Mahmoud Radi (New Ahmadi Hospital, Ahmadi, Kuwait, Ahmadi, Kuwait) A Amir Elissawy (Touro College of Osteopathic Medicine, NY, New York, United States) K khaled zahrawi (Misr University for Science and Technology (MUST), Giza, Egypt, Giza, Egypt) T Tawfik Besheya (Faculty of Medicine, University of Tripoli, Tripoli, Libya, Tripoli, Libya) R Richard Riccelli (Christian Brothers Academy, Syracuse, New York, USA, NY, New York, United States) A Ahmed Elaraby (Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt) A Ayaan Arora (Christian Brothers Academy, Syracuse, New York, NY, New York, United States) D dina almahmoud (Faculty of Medicine, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Irbid, Jordan) J Jessan Jishu (Candidate at Tulane University School of Medicine, New orleans, Louisiana, United States) E Eman Toraih (Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana, United States) H Hani Aiash (SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, USA, NY, New York, United States)

Abstract

Background: Coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) is vital for diagnosing ischemic heart disease, yet its accuracy is affected by varying reader expertise. Artificial Intelligence (AI)-driven automated stenosis assessment offers promise for enhancing diagnostic consistency. Aim: We aim to evaluate an AI-CCTA assessment against invasive coronary angiography, invasive FFR, and expert readings. Methods: We performed a comprehensive search in Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE from inception until March 2025. Two independent reviewers screened articles and extracted data on study design, patient demographics, AI methodology, stenosis thresholds, and outcomes. For statistical analysis, we constructed summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curves and used a bivariate random-effects model to derive pooled sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratios (DOR), and area under the curve (AUC). Forest plots were generated to visualize these metrics. Results: Our meta-analysis included 34 studies with 10,067 patients. AI-based CCTA demonstrated excellent diagnostic performance with an AUC of 0.932 for per-patient analysis. The pooled per-patient sensitivity was 0.89 (95% CI: 0.87–0.91) and specificity was 0.80 (95% CI: 0.74–0.86), with a DOR of 37.07 (95% CI: 24.57–55.92). AI validated against expert readers achieved the highest accuracy (0.94, 95% CI: 0.87-0.98). The >70% stenosis threshold demonstrated superior performance (accuracy: 0.89, specificity: 0.96) compared to the >50% threshold (accuracy: 0.86, specificity: 0.87). Per-vessel analysis showed comparable results with an AUC of 0.905. Conclusion: Our meta-analysis confirms that AI-assisted coronary CT angiography delivers high diagnostic performance for coronary stenosis detection, with strong AUC values, high sensitivity and specificity, and robust diagnostic odds ratios across both per-patient and per-vessel assessments.

Article Details

Journal Circulation
Volume / Issue Vol. 152, Issue Suppl_3
Published November 04, 2025
ISSN 0009-7322
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Circulation

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0009-7322 Health Sciences

Authors (16)

A

Abdelrahman Hafez

Cardiology Department, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, United States

A

Ahmed Sobhy

M

Mennatullah Ashour

College of Human Medicine, Benha University, Benha, Egypt, Benha, Egypt

K

Karim Aiash

Jamesville-DeWitt High School, Syracuse, New York, USA, NY, New York, United States

A

Abdulrahman Aldemerdash

University of Alexandria, Alexandria, Alexandria, Alexandria, Egypt

A

Amro Mahmoud Radi

New Ahmadi Hospital, Ahmadi, Kuwait, Ahmadi, Kuwait

A

Amir Elissawy

Touro College of Osteopathic Medicine, NY, New York, United States

K

khaled zahrawi

Misr University for Science and Technology (MUST), Giza, Egypt, Giza, Egypt

T

Tawfik Besheya

Faculty of Medicine, University of Tripoli, Tripoli, Libya, Tripoli, Libya

R

Richard Riccelli

Christian Brothers Academy, Syracuse, New York, USA, NY, New York, United States

A

Ahmed Elaraby

Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt

A

Ayaan Arora

Christian Brothers Academy, Syracuse, New York, NY, New York, United States

D

dina almahmoud

Faculty of Medicine, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Irbid, Jordan

J

Jessan Jishu

Candidate at Tulane University School of Medicine, New orleans, Louisiana, United States

E

Eman Toraih

Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana, United States

H

Hani Aiash

SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, USA, NY, New York, United States