Abstract 4368630: Prevalence of FDG-avidity in genetic cardiomyopathy and prediction of arrhythmic free survival

G Graham Bevan (University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States) S Shiva Tabaghi (University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States) M Mallika Lal (Oregon Health&Science University, Portland, Oregon, United States) K Kimia Memar (University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States) M Madison Pico (Oregon Health&Science University, Portland, Oregon, United States) R Richard Cheng A April Stempien-Otero (University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States) N Neal Chatterjee (University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States) B Benjamin Levin (Oregon Health&Science University, Portland, Oregon, United States) B Babak Nazer (University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States)

Abstract

Introduction: Cardiac 18 FDG-PET is an imaging modality frequently used to diagnose inflammatory cardiomyopathies such as cardiac sarcoidosis. Japanese Circulation Society (JCS) guidelines propose a set of criteria for non-invasively diagnosing isolated cardiac sarcoidosis using 18 FDG-PET. Recent data suggests that many patients with 18 FDG-avid PET have genetic cardiomyopathies. We hypothesize that 18 FDG -avidity may be a marker of inflammation or metabolic dysregulation which is pro-arrhythmic. Objectives: To compare the clinical presentation and prevalence of pathogenic variants in patients with and without 18 FDG -avidity and to determine whether 18 FDG -avidity predicts VT/VF free survival. Methods: A retrospective cohort study utilizing patients from University of Washington and Oregon Health Science University who underwent 18 FDG -PET and had genetic testing through Invitae. Patients with biopsy proven sarcoidosis were excluded. Chi-square statistical testing was used to compare groups and Cox-regression was used to assess survival free from the composite endpoint of VT/VF or mortality. Results: A total of 202 patients with genetic testing and 18 FDG -PET were identified across 2 institutions yielding 100 patients with 18 FDG -avidity and 102 patients with 18 FDG -negative PET. A total of 35 patients had pathogenic or likely pathogenic (P/LP) genetic variants, 37% of whom were 18 FDG -avid (Figure 1; P-value 0.1). Patient demographics and presenting clinical features were similar between 18 FDG -avid and 18 FDG -negative patients (Table 1). P/LP variants ( 18 FDG -avid, 18 FDG -negative) include DSP (1,4), FLNC (1,1), LMNA (3,8), MYBPC3 (1,0), MYH7 (1,2), TTN (5,4). Of the 100 18 FDG -avid patients, 51% met JCS criteria for isolated cardiac sarcoidosis and 14% (n=7) of 18 FDG -avid patients meeting JSC criteria had P/LP variants. In Cox regression analysis, VT/VF free survival was similar between 18 FDG -avid patients with and without P/LP variants and 18 FDG -negative patients with and without LP/P variants (p=0.26). 18 FDG-avid patients had similar VT/VF free survival to 18 FDG-negative patients (p=0.21). Conclusion: There was a similar prevalence of P/LP variants amongst patients with and without 18 FDG -avidity. JCS criteria was commonly met by patients with 18 FDG -avidity and amongst 18 FDG -avid patients with P/LP variants suggesting a lack of specificity for isolated cardiac sarcoidosis. Cardiac FDG-avidity was not associated with increased VT/VF/mortality.

Article Details

Journal Circulation
Volume / Issue Vol. 152, Issue Suppl_3
Published November 04, 2025
ISSN 0009-7322
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Circulation

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0009-7322 Health Sciences

Authors (10)

G

Graham Bevan

University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States

S

Shiva Tabaghi

University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States

M

Mallika Lal

Oregon Health&Science University, Portland, Oregon, United States

K

Kimia Memar

University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States

M

Madison Pico

Oregon Health&Science University, Portland, Oregon, United States

R

Richard Cheng

A

April Stempien-Otero

University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States

N

Neal Chatterjee

University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States

B

Benjamin Levin

Oregon Health&Science University, Portland, Oregon, United States

B

Babak Nazer

University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States