Abstract 4368330: Outcomes of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Chronic Total Occlusion Compared to Optimal Medical Therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
Introduction: Chronic total occlusion (CTO) is commonly encountered in patients with coronary artery disease and is associated with adverse outcomes, including increased short- and long-term mortality. While percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has shown potential clinical benefits in CTO patients, its comparative effectiveness against optimal medical therapy (OMT) remains debated. This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the impact of CTO-PCI versus OMT on key cardiovascular outcomes. Methods: We conducted a comprehensive search of Pubmed, Scopus, Web of science and Cochrane. We assessed outcomes including all-cause mortality, cardiac death, myocardial reinfarction, major adverse cardiac events (MACE), stroke, and repeat revascularization. Pooled risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using a random-effects model. Statistical significance was defined as p<0.05. Results: 25 studies with a total of 22102 patients were included. Compared to OMT alone, CTO-PCI was associated with a significant reduction in the overall all-cause mortality (RR: 0.66; 95% CI: 0.53–0.82; p=0.0002), cardiovascular mortality (RR: 0.65; 95% CI: 0.52–0.82; p=0.0003) and MACE (RR: 0.84; 95% CI: 0.71–0.98; p=0.03). No statistically significant differences were observed between CTO-PCI and OMT in rates of Stroke (RR: 1.01; 95% CI: 0.68–1.50; p=0.96), Subsequent PCI/CABG (revascularization) (RR: 1.01; 95% CI: 0.78–1.29; p=0.97) or Heart Failure Hospitalization (RR: 0.77; 95% CI: 0.37–1.59; p=0.48) Conclusion: This is the largest and most updated systematic review meta analysis for CTO-PCI vs OMT. Our findings show that CTO-PCI is associated with significantly lower all-cause and cardiovascular mortality compared to OMT. However, no significant differences were observed between the two strategies in the incidence of stroke, need for subsequent revascularization (PCI/CABG), or heart failure hospitalization.
Article Details
Authors (15)
Zeyad Kholeif
Baptist Hospital of SouthEast Texas, Beaumont, Texas, United States
Ahmed Mohamed
Mohab Elnashar
UAMS, Little Rock, Arkansas, United States
Imad Samman Tahhan
Medical University of South Carolin, Charleston, South Carolina, United States
Mohamed Elnady
Faculty of medicine Kafer El Sheikh, Kafer el sheikh, Egypt
Rana Rashwan
Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States
Khaled Ali
Mohammed Ashwaq Hussain Shaik
ACSR GOVT medical College, Nellore, India
Rana Elsayed
Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
Ahmed Elnaggar
Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
Ahmed Diaa
Faculty of Medicine, Al-azhar University, Cairo, Egypt
Aya Elalfy
Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, United States
Mohamed Fawzi Hemida
Ahmed Farid Gadelmawla
Faculty of Medicine, Menoufia University, Menoufia, Egypt
Hamza Elkasaby
Faculty of Medicine, Newgiza University, Cairo, Egypt