Abstract 4367939: Performance of General Adult Congenital Heart Disease (ACHD) Risk Calculators for Predicting Arrhythmic Substrate and Clinical Arrhythmias in Repaired Tetralogy of Fallot (rTOF)

I Isaac Knouff (University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States) B Bryce Johnson (University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States) A Annette Vo (University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States) M Matthew Magoon (University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States) M Mark Sonderman (University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States) R Rosemary McDonagh (Biosense Webster, Seattle, Washington, United States) P Patrick Boyle (University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States) E Eric Krieger (University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States) N Nazem Akoum (University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States) N Neal Chatterjee (University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States) M Melissa Robinson (Providence Missoula MT, Missoula, Montana, United States) B Babak Nazer (University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States)

Abstract

Introduction: Patients with rTOF are at elevated risk of ventricular tachycardia (VT) and sudden cardiac death (SCD), primarily due to slowly conducting anatomic isthmuses (SCAI) formed during surgical repair. Although existing ACHD risk calculators like Risk of SCD in ACHD (RSACHD) and PREVENTION-ACHD (PACHD) help predict SCD in broad ACHD populations, their performance in rTOF—particularly in predicting presence of SCAI—is unknown. Objective: This study aims to evaluate the ability of these calculators to predict the presence of SCAI, inducible VT during programmed ventricular stimulation (PVS), or clinical arrhythmic events in a large rTOF population. Methods: We retrospectively studied patients with repaired TOF (rTOF) in a single academic center, dividing them into 3 groups: those who underwent prophylactic electrophysiology study (EPS) with PVS and electroanatomic mapping for ablation of SCAI (Group 1; n=58), those with EPS with PVS only (Group 2; n=35), or those with a clinical diagnosis of rTOF with no EPS (Group 3; n=269). Outcomes included the presence of SCAI (Group 1), inducibility of VT (Groups 1-2), and a composite arrhythmic outcome of sustained VT, SCD, or appropriate ICD shock (Groups 2-3). RSACHD and PACHD scores were analyzed using logistic regression to assess associations with outcomes; significance was defined as α ≤ 0.05. Results: The cohort included 361 patients (46% male, mean age 36 years). Neither RSACHD nor PACHD scores were associated with SCAI (n = 58 patients, p = 0.17 and 0.93, respectively; Fig. 1a) or inducible VT (n =93 patients, p = 0.09 and 0.62; Fig. 1b). Both scores, however, were significantly associated with the composite outcome (n = 278 patients, p < 0.01 for both; Fig. 1c). Conclusion: While RSACHD and PACHD scores are associated with clinical arrhythmic outcomes in rTOF patients, they do not reliably predict SCAI or inducible VT. These findings suggest that while useful for long-term risk stratification, current ACHD risk calculators do not capture the anatomic mechanisms underlying VT in rTOF or guide timing of “prophylactic EPS” (commonly performed prior to pulmonary valve replacement). Further work is needed to develop targeted tools for substrate-level risk prediction.

Article Details

Journal Circulation
Volume / Issue Vol. 152, Issue Suppl_3
Published November 04, 2025
ISSN 0009-7322
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Circulation

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0009-7322 Health Sciences

Authors (12)

I

Isaac Knouff

University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States

B

Bryce Johnson

University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States

A

Annette Vo

University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States

M

Matthew Magoon

University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States

M

Mark Sonderman

University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States

R

Rosemary McDonagh

Biosense Webster, Seattle, Washington, United States

P

Patrick Boyle

University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States

E

Eric Krieger

University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States

N

Nazem Akoum

University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States

N

Neal Chatterjee

University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States

M

Melissa Robinson

Providence Missoula MT, Missoula, Montana, United States

B

Babak Nazer

University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States