Abstract 4367912: Safety and Outcomes of Class Ic Antiarrhythmic Use in Post-PCI Patients With New-Onset Atrial Fibrillation: A Nationwide Cohort Study.

P Po Hsueh Su (National Cheng Kung University, Tainan City, Taiwan) H Hui-Wen Lin S Sheng-Hsiang Lin Y Yi-Heng Lee (National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan)

Abstract

Background: After percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), newly-diagnosed atrial fibrillation (AF) poses a dual threat of thrombo-embolism and arrhythmic complications. Because Class Ic anti-arrhythmic drugs have long been discouraged in coronary artery disease, evidence on their safety and effectiveness in this setting remains limited. Objective: To assess whether early Class Ic therapy is associated with improved outcomes in patients developing AF within one year after PCI. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using Taiwan’s National Health Insurance Research Database (2013–2022). Among 321,848 patients undergoing PCI, 10,974 adults with incident AF (diagnosed within 1 year post-PCI) were included. After exclusions (prior AF, valvular disease, prior Class Ic use, <1-year follow-up), 403 received a Class Ic drug within 30 days of AF onset; 4,030 were comparators. Inverse probability of treatment weighting balanced baseline covariates (mean age 75; 68% male; mean CHA2DS2VASc: 4). Median follow-up was 2 years. The primary outcome was a composite of ischemic stroke, hemorrhagic stroke, or transient ischemic attack (TIA). Secondary endpoints included all-cause mortality, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE: cardiovascular death, MI, stroke, or HF hospitalization), and ventricular arrhythmia. Cox and competing risk models estimated adjusted hazard ratios (aHR/asHR). Results: Class Ic use was associated with lower risk of composite cerebrovascular events (asHR 0.63; 95% CI 0.52–0.76; p<0.001), ischemic stroke (asHR 0.66; 95% CI 0.54–0.81), and hemorrhagic stroke (asHR 0.39; 95% CI 0.25–0.62). All-cause mortality was reduced (aHR 0.63; 95% CI 0.59–0.67), as was MACE (asHR 0.59; 95% CI 0.55–0.64) and HF hospitalization (asHR 0.55; 95% CI 0.51–0.60). Class Ic therapy was not associated with increased risk of ventricular arrhythmia (asHR 0.88; 95% CI 0.67–1.17; p=0.40). (Table 1) Conclusion: Among stable post-PCI patients with new-onset AF, Class Ic antiarrhythmic drugs were associated with reduced thromboembolic events, cardiovascular morbidity, and mortality, without increased proarrhythmic risk. These findings challenge historical reservations and support reconsidering Class Ic therapy as a viable rhythm-control option in stable post-PCI populations.

Article Details

Journal Circulation
Volume / Issue Vol. 152, Issue Suppl_3
Published November 04, 2025
ISSN 0009-7322
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Circulation

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0009-7322 Health Sciences

Authors (4)

P

Po Hsueh Su

National Cheng Kung University, Tainan City, Taiwan

H

Hui-Wen Lin

S

Sheng-Hsiang Lin

Y

Yi-Heng Lee

National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan