Abstract 4367773: Predicting Peak Heart Rate from Resting 12-Lead ECGs in Patients Undergoing Stress Testing using Deep Learning

X Xichong Liu (Department of Medicine (R.A.A., S.B., K.A.B., X.L., P.G., A.C.P., E.A.A., P.J.W., M.V.P., S.M.N., A.J.R.), Stanford University, CA.) S Sabyasachi Bandyopadhyay P Prasanth Ganesan (Department of Medicine (R.A.A., S.B., K.A.B., X.L., P.G., A.C.P., E.A.A., P.J.W., M.V.P., S.M.N., A.J.R.), Stanford University, CA.) S Sulaiman Somani (Stanford Health Care, Stanford, California, United States) K Kelly Brennan (Stanford University, San Francisco, California, United States) A Alexander Karius (Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States) T Tina Baykaner (Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States) A Alexander Perino (Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States) P Paul Wang (Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States) E Euan Ashley M Marco Perez (Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.) S Sanjiv Narayan (STANFORD MEDICINE, Stanford, California, United States) A Albert Rogers (Stanford University, Redwood City, California, United States)

Abstract

Introduction: Cardiovascular stress testing is crucial for the evaluation of ischemic cardiomyopathy and inducible arrhythmias. Inappropriate heart rate (HR) response during stress, or chronotropic incompetence, is associated with sinus node disease, conduction system abnormalities, and decreased functional capacity. However, inappropriate exercise tolerance often presents during stress testing, necessitating early termination. Early identification of those who are unable to complete testing due to exercise intolerance or chronotropic incompetence could streamline subsequent testing and management. This study investigates the feasibility of using deep learning models to predict peak HR using resting 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG). Research Questions: Can a deep learning model effectively learn from resting 12-lead ECG waveforms to: (1) classify whether a patient's peak heart rate will exceed predicted peak HR defined as (230-age) × 0.8, and (2) predict the peak heart rate achieved during a stress test? Methods: A total of 7,625 stress test records were obtained from a single institution, from which 6986 samples (4893 training/validation, 2093 test) were included. Preprocessing involved extracting 12-lead ECG signals, identifying the resting waveform and the peak HR during stress. All 12 standard leads were required for inclusion, and ECG waveforms were padded to a uniform sequence length. The processed data was used to train two separate convolutional neural networks for predicting appropriate stress response and the peak HR. Results: The training/validation set had a mean peak HR of 137.5 beats per minute (SD = 34.9) and the testing set had a mean peak HR of 137.0 (SD = 35.3). The proportion of samples that met age-based peak HR threshold in the training/validation and testing set is 64.7% and 65.9% respectively. The model achieved an AUROC of 0.83 (95% CI 0.81-0.85) and an F1-score of 0.85 for the classification task. A separate model with similar architecture predicted peak HR with an R-value of 0.69 (95% CI 0.67-0.72) and root mean square error of 26.2 beats per minute (95% CI 25.3-27.2). Conclusion: Our findings show that the resting ECG can be leveraged for the prediction of HR response prior to stress testing. Successful models could offer clinicians a valuable non-invasive tool for early risk stratification, guiding patient management in the evaluation of ischemic heart disease, and identifying those at risk for chronotropic incompetence.

Article Details

Journal Circulation
Volume / Issue Vol. 152, Issue Suppl_3
Published November 04, 2025
ISSN 0009-7322
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Circulation

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0009-7322 Health Sciences

Authors (13)

X

Xichong Liu

Department of Medicine (R.A.A., S.B., K.A.B., X.L., P.G., A.C.P., E.A.A., P.J.W., M.V.P., S.M.N., A.J.R.), Stanford University, CA.

S

Sabyasachi Bandyopadhyay

P

Prasanth Ganesan

Department of Medicine (R.A.A., S.B., K.A.B., X.L., P.G., A.C.P., E.A.A., P.J.W., M.V.P., S.M.N., A.J.R.), Stanford University, CA.

S

Sulaiman Somani

Stanford Health Care, Stanford, California, United States

K

Kelly Brennan

Stanford University, San Francisco, California, United States

A

Alexander Karius

Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States

T

Tina Baykaner

Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States

A

Alexander Perino

Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States

P

Paul Wang

Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States

E

Euan Ashley

M

Marco Perez

Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.

S

Sanjiv Narayan

STANFORD MEDICINE, Stanford, California, United States

A

Albert Rogers

Stanford University, Redwood City, California, United States