Abstract 4367655: Comparative Cardiometabolic Outcomes of Tirzepatide Versus Semaglutide in Patients with HFpEF and Obesity: A Real-World Multicenter Cohort Study
Abstract
Background: HFpEF frequently coexists with obesity and type 2 diabetes, both of which are associated with adverse cardiometabolic outcomes. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) like semaglutide have shown promise in weight and glycemic control, while tirzepatide, a dual GIP/GLP-1 receptor agonist, may offer superior metabolic effects. However, comparative real-world cardiovascular outcomes in HFpEF patients remain understudied. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the TriNetX Research Network. Adults with a diagnosis of HFpEF and obesity who were treated with either semaglutide or tirzepatide were identified.The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, cholelithiasis, and pancreatitis. Propensity score matching (1:1) was performed for age, sex, race, comorbidities, and baseline medications Results: After matching, 40,047 patients were included (Semaglutide: 20,028; Tirzepatide: 20,019). All-cause mortality was higher with Semaglutide (2.9% vs 2.0%; OR 1.47, 95% CI 1.29–1.67, p<0.001). Myocardial infarction occurred in 2.8% of Semaglutide users vs 2.2% with Tirzepatide (OR 1.28, p=0.001), while heart failure exacerbations were more frequent with Semaglutide (10.1% vs 8.3%; OR 1.24, p=0.012). Acute kidney injury was also slightly higher in the Semaglutide group (7.0% vs 6.2%; OR 1.14, p=0.016), as were readmissions (13.1% vs 10.2%; OR 1.33, p<0.001). Rates of cholelithiasis (1.7% vs 1.5%) and pancreatitis (0.4% vs 0.4%) were comparable. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis demonstrated significantly better survival with Tirzepatide (85.8% vs 74.7%, p<0.001), with a corresponding hazard ratio of 1.28 (95% CI 1.12–1.45), favoring Tirzepatide. Conclusions: In this large real-world cohort of obese patients with HFpEF, Tirzepatide was associated with lower risks of all-cause mortality, cardiovascular events, HF exacerbation, and readmissions compared to Semaglutide, without a significant increase in adverse events. These findings support the potential cardioprotective role of Tirzepatide and warrant prospective validation in HFpEF populations.
Article Details
Authors (6)
Siddharth Agrawal
New York medical college landmark, Woonsocket , Rhode Island, United States
Ritu C. Tated
New York Medical College, Valhalla, New York, United States
Hritvik Jain
Kriti Soni
SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, New York, United States
Saraschandra Vallabhajosyula
Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, United States
Pragyat Futela
MetroHealth Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, United States