Abstract 4367421: Cardiogenic Shock Patients Achieving Native Heart Survival With Impella 5.5 Support Still Experience Significant Skeletal Muscle Loss

R Robert Adamian (UPMC, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States) S Steven Hopkins (UPMC, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States) J Jonathan Zawadzki (UPMC, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States) A Alexis Barnes (UPMC, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States) A Alex Crane (UPMC, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States) W Wyatt Klass (UPMC, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States) Z Zachary Rhinehart (UPMC, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States) H Holt Murray (UPMC, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States) C Catalin Toma J Jeffrey Fowler (UPMC, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States) A Anson Smith (UNIVERSITY PITTSBURGH MEDICAL CNTR, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States) C CHRISTINA THORNGREN (UPMC, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States) R Roy Sriwattanakomen (UPMC, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States) M MARY KEEBLER (UPMC, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States) J Jonathan Wolfe (UPMC, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States) G Gavin Hickey (UPMC, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States)

Abstract

Background: Impella 5.5 is increasingly used to support patients with cardiogenic shock, some of whom recover native heart function without requiring durable mechanical support or transplant. The degree of catabolic stress in this population remains poorly characterized. We evaluated changes in skeletal muscle mass, using psoas muscle index (PMI), in patients with native heart survival following Impella support. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 26 patients with cardiogenic shock treated with Impella 5.5 who recovered native cardiac function. PMI was calculated from CT scans obtained pre-implant and post-explant. Patients were stratified by initial SCAI shock stage. Paired t-tests, Mann-Whitney U tests, and Spearman correlations were used for statistical analysis. Results: Across the cohort, PMI significantly declined during support (mean ΔPMI: –0.25, p = 0.0091). Patients presenting with SCAI Stage A experienced greater PMI loss (median ΔPMI: –0.51) than those with SCAI Stages B–E (median ΔPMI: –0.18), though this difference did not reach statistical significance ( p = 0.097) (Figure). Pre-implant PMI was numerically higher in SCAI A patients, but not statistically different ( p = 0.27). No correlation was observed between PMI loss and post-explant hospitalization duration (ρ = 0.044, p = 0.83). Conclusion: Patients with Impella-supported cardiogenic shock who recover native heart function still experience significant skeletal muscle loss. A trend toward greater loss in SCAI A patients may reflect longer duration of support, higher baseline muscle mass, or survivorship bias. These findings are hypothesis-generating and suggest a potential role for early rehabilitation or nutritional interventions during support.

Article Details

Journal Circulation
Volume / Issue Vol. 152, Issue Suppl_3
Published November 04, 2025
ISSN 0009-7322
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Circulation

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0009-7322 Health Sciences

Authors (16)

R

Robert Adamian

UPMC, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

S

Steven Hopkins

UPMC, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

J

Jonathan Zawadzki

UPMC, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

A

Alexis Barnes

UPMC, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

A

Alex Crane

UPMC, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

W

Wyatt Klass

UPMC, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

Z

Zachary Rhinehart

UPMC, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

H

Holt Murray

UPMC, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

C

Catalin Toma

J

Jeffrey Fowler

UPMC, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

A

Anson Smith

UNIVERSITY PITTSBURGH MEDICAL CNTR, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

C

CHRISTINA THORNGREN

UPMC, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

R

Roy Sriwattanakomen

UPMC, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

M

MARY KEEBLER

UPMC, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

J

Jonathan Wolfe

UPMC, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

G

Gavin Hickey

UPMC, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States