Abstract 4367206: Comparison of Long-Term Outcomes With Metoprolol vs Carvedilol in Women With Peripartum Cardiomyopathy: A Propensity-Matched Analysis

Y Yong Hao Yeo (William Beaumont Hospital Royal Oak, Royal Oak, Michigan, United States) A Aravinthan Vignarajah (Cleveland Clinic Fairview Hospital, Fairview Park, Ohio, United States) H Hermon Kha Kin Wong (University of Malaysia Sabah, Johor Bahru, Malaysia) T Tze Ern Ong (Interfaith Medical Center, Masjid Tanah, Malaysia) K Kamala Tamirisa (Texas Cardiac Arrhythmia Institute, Southlake, Texas, United States) M Melinda Davis (University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States)

Abstract

Background: Beta-adrenergic blockers are commonly prescribed in the management of peripartum cardiomyopathy (PPCM) during the postpartum period. However, real-world data directly comparing the long-term clinical outcomes of metoprolol versus carvedilol in this population remains limited. Methods: Using the TriNetX network, we identified women diagnosed with peripartum cardiomyopathy (PPCM) after delivery. Patients were stratified into two cohorts based on beta-blocker therapy received within 6 months after the diagnosis of PPCM: those treated with metoprolol and those treated with carvedilol. Individuals with a history of heart failure before pregnancy were excluded. Clinical outcomes, including all-cause mortality, all-cause hospitalization, heart failure hospitalization, and proportions of patients with LVEF ≥50%, were evaluated at 1-year and 5-year follow-up intervals. Cohorts were propensity score-matched based on medical comorbidities and medications received. Results: Among 1,438 eligible patients, propensity score matching yielded two balanced cohorts of 517 patients each: one treated with metoprolol (mean age 31.5 ± 6.9 years; 41.6% Black; 35.6% White) and the other with carvedilol (mean age 31.5 ± 6.1 years; 41.2% Black; 37.3% White). At 1-year follow-up, the metoprolol group had a significantly lower risk of heart failure hospitalization compared to the carvedilol group (22.4% vs. 28.8%; HR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.59–0.95; p = 0.02). However, there were no significant differences between the two groups in all-cause mortality (1.9% vs. 1.9%; HR, 1.70; 95% CI, 0.62–4.68; p = 0.30), all-cause hospitalization (55.1% vs. 55.1%; HR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.85–1.18; p = 0.99), or proportions of patients with LVEF ≥50% (9.1% vs. 7.9%; HR, 1.19; 95% CI, 0.78–1.81; p = 0.42). Similar trends were observed at the 5-year follow-up. Conclusion: Among women with PPCM, metoprolol use was associated with a lower risk of heart failure hospitalization compared to carvedilol at both 1-year and 5-year follow-up.

Article Details

Journal Circulation
Volume / Issue Vol. 152, Issue Suppl_3
Published November 04, 2025
ISSN 0009-7322
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Circulation

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0009-7322 Health Sciences

Authors (6)

Y

Yong Hao Yeo

William Beaumont Hospital Royal Oak, Royal Oak, Michigan, United States

A

Aravinthan Vignarajah

Cleveland Clinic Fairview Hospital, Fairview Park, Ohio, United States

H

Hermon Kha Kin Wong

University of Malaysia Sabah, Johor Bahru, Malaysia

T

Tze Ern Ong

Interfaith Medical Center, Masjid Tanah, Malaysia

K

Kamala Tamirisa

Texas Cardiac Arrhythmia Institute, Southlake, Texas, United States

M

Melinda Davis

University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States