Abstract 4367097: Oral Anticoagulant Monotherapy vs Dual Antithrombotic Therapy in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation and Stable Coronary Artery Disease Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Insights from a Real-World TriNetX Cohort Study

A Aseed Mestarihi (University of central Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States) O Omar Obeidat (UCF HCA North Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States) Q Qusai Alqudah (UCF-North Florida Hospital, Gainesville, Florida, United States) A Abdallah Rayyan (University of Central Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States) M Mohamad Mansour (MedStar Health Georgetown University (Baltimore) Program, Batlimore, Maryland, United States) M Mohd Daise (University of Central Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States) A Anil KC

Abstract

Background: The optimal long-term antithrombotic strategy in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and stable coronary artery disease (CAD) post-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains uncertain. While oral anticoagulant (OAC) monotherapy may reduce bleeding risk, concerns persist regarding its effectiveness in preventing ischemic events compared to combined OAC and single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT). Aim: This study aimed to compare the effectiveness and safety of OAC monotherapy versus combined OAC and SAPT in a real-world cohort of patients with AF and stable CAD, ≥1 year post-PCI. Methods: Using the TriNetX global federated health research network, we conducted a retrospective cohort analysis including 6,950 matched patients on OAC monotherapy and 6,950 matched patients on combined OAC and SAPT, after propensity score matching from initial cohorts of 10,304 and 8,235 patients, respectively. Outcomes evaluated at 1 and 3 years included all-cause mortality, ischemic stroke, myocardial infarction (MI), pulmonary embolism (PE), and major bleeding events. Results: At 1 year, OAC monotherapy had higher mortality (10.8% vs. 6.7%; OR 1.690, CI [1.497,1.907], p<0.001), lower stroke risk (5.4% vs. 6.4%; OR 0.835, CI [0.725,0.963], p=0.013), higher MI (36.2% vs. 17.8%; OR 2.624, CI [2.426,2.839], p<0.001), with no difference in PE (1.6% vs. 1.3%; OR 1.2, CI [0.965,1.699], p=0.086) or bleeding (5.3% each; OR 1.0, CI [0.862,1.161], p=1.0). At 3 years, OAC monotherapy demonstrated sustained higher mortality (13.6% vs. 12.3%; OR 1.128, CI [1.021,1.245], p=0.018), higher MI (36.7% vs. 24.6%; OR 1.772, CI [1.647,1.907], p<0.001), reduced stroke risk (5.8% vs. 9.1%; OR 0.617, CI [0.542,0.702], p<0.001), and lower bleeding (6.0% vs. 8.5%; OR 0.683, CI [0.600,0.778], p<0.001), with no difference in PE. Conclusions: In this large, real-world matched cohort, OAC monotherapy in patients with AF and stable CAD post-PCI was associated with increased mortality and significantly higher myocardial infarction rates despite a reduction in ischemic stroke compared to combined therapy. OAC monotherapy was associated with significantly lower bleeding risk at 3 years.

Article Details

Journal Circulation
Volume / Issue Vol. 152, Issue Suppl_3
Published November 04, 2025
ISSN 0009-7322
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Circulation

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0009-7322 Health Sciences

Authors (7)

A

Aseed Mestarihi

University of central Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States

O

Omar Obeidat

UCF HCA North Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States

Q

Qusai Alqudah

UCF-North Florida Hospital, Gainesville, Florida, United States

A

Abdallah Rayyan

University of Central Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States

M

Mohamad Mansour

MedStar Health Georgetown University (Baltimore) Program, Batlimore, Maryland, United States

M

Mohd Daise

University of Central Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States

A

Anil KC