Abstract 4366960: Interhospital Transfer versus Direct Admission for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

A Anwar Zahran F Fathi Milhem (An-Najah National University, Nablus, Palestine, State of) S Saja Amer (An-Najah National University, Nablus, Palestine, State of) M Mohammad Bdair A Abdalhakim Shubietah (Advocate Illinois Masonic Med Ctr, Chicago, Illinois, United States) M Mohammedsadeq A. Shweliya (Baghdad University, Baghdad , Iraq) K khadeeja Hamzah (Baghdad University AIkindy College, Baghdad , Iraq) F Firas Besharieh (An-Najah National University, Nablus, Palestine, State of) O Orabi Hajjeh (An-Najah National University, Nablus, Palestine, State of) N Nadeem Khayat (An-Najah National University, Nablus, Palestine, State of) A Ahmad Mohammad (Hurley Medical Center-MSU, Grand Blanc , Michigan, United States) M Mohamed Elgendy

Abstract

Background: Timely reperfusion with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is critical for patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). However, whether interhospital transfer delays impact clinical outcomes compared with direct admission remains uncertain. Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing interhospital transfer versus direct admission for primary PCI in STEMI patients. Searches were performed in PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, and Web of Science. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included post-discharge mortality (30 days, 6 months, 12 months), major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), stroke, bleeding, target vessel revascularization, heart failure hospitalization, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and reperfusion time metrics. Results: Sixteen studies (n = 165,084) were included, comprising ten retrospective cohorts and six prospective cohorts. In-hospital mortality was lower in the transfer group (RR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.69–0.96) with absolute risk reduction is 7 fewer per 1000, while 6-month post-discharge mortality was lower in the direct admission group (RR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.25–1.43) and the absolute risk is 14 more deaths per 1000 in the transfer group. No significant differences were found in MACE, stroke, bleeding, heart failure hospitalization, or total all-cause death. Transferred patients had a slightly lower LVEF (mean difference −1.57%; 95% CI, −2.58 to −0.57). Direct admission was associated with shorter symptom-to-balloon and total ischemic times, while door-to-balloon time was slightly shorter in transferred patients. Conclusion: In STEMI patients treated with primary PCI, interhospital transfer was not associated with worse clinical outcomes despite longer delays to reperfusion. These findings highlight the critical role of coordinated STEMI networks in mitigating time-dependent risk and delivering equitable care across pathways.

Article Details

Journal Circulation
Volume / Issue Vol. 152, Issue Suppl_3
Published November 04, 2025
ISSN 0009-7322
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Circulation

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0009-7322 Health Sciences

Authors (12)

A

Anwar Zahran

F

Fathi Milhem

An-Najah National University, Nablus, Palestine, State of

S

Saja Amer

An-Najah National University, Nablus, Palestine, State of

M

Mohammad Bdair

A

Abdalhakim Shubietah

Advocate Illinois Masonic Med Ctr, Chicago, Illinois, United States

M

Mohammedsadeq A. Shweliya

Baghdad University, Baghdad , Iraq

K

khadeeja Hamzah

Baghdad University AIkindy College, Baghdad , Iraq

F

Firas Besharieh

An-Najah National University, Nablus, Palestine, State of

O

Orabi Hajjeh

An-Najah National University, Nablus, Palestine, State of

N

Nadeem Khayat

An-Najah National University, Nablus, Palestine, State of

A

Ahmad Mohammad

Hurley Medical Center-MSU, Grand Blanc , Michigan, United States

M

Mohamed Elgendy