Abstract 4366827: Large Language Models Detect Ventricular Tachycardia Recurrence in Clinical Notes and Enable Prediction of Clinical Outcomes at Scale

S Shirin Sadri (Stanford University, Mountain View, California, United States) K Kelly Brennan (Stanford University, San Francisco, California, United States) S Sabyasachi Bandyopadhyay Y Yaanik Desai (STANFORD FALK CVRC, Stanford, California, United States) P Prasanth Ganesan (Department of Medicine (R.A.A., S.B., K.A.B., X.L., P.G., A.C.P., E.A.A., P.J.W., M.V.P., S.M.N., A.J.R.), Stanford University, CA.) E Esteban Peralta (Stanford University, Mountain View, California, United States) R Ruibin Feng (Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, United States) C Charles Sillett (Stanford University, Mountain View, California, United States) S Samuel Ruiperez-Campillo (Stanford University, Mountain View, California, United States) P Paul Wang (Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States) P Paul Clopton (Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States) A Albert Rogers (Stanford University, Redwood City, California, United States) S Sanjiv Narayan (STANFORD MEDICINE, Stanford, California, United States)

Abstract

Introduction: Predicting recurrence in patients with Ventricular Tachycardia (VT) remains challenging, and manual screens of clinical notes are laborious. Advances in natural language processing, particularly Large Language Models (LLMs), offer potential solutions for automating VT detection from notes on large scale, and correlating clinical outcomes. Hypothesis: LLMs can detect VT recurrence events - as opposed to baseline VT - from clinical notes with accuracy comparable to physicians, and LLM-based detection can facilitate large-scale outcome prediction. Methods: A VT ablation registry of clinical notes of N=362 patients (20,303 Notes, 25.2% female, mean age 58.6±14.0 years) was examined. A development cohort of 100 notes was independently annotated by 3 board-certified physician reviewers for reference. Using a HIPAA compliant GPT-4o, we evaluated 4 prompt variations in this subset against physician annotations, then applied the optimal prompt to the full 20,203 notes. Baseline demographics were assessed at time of VT diagnosis, and quarterly use of AADs 3 years post-VT was assessed. Predictors of first VT recurrence were evaluated using multivariate Cox regression with time-varying medication use. Results: Inter-rater reliability in the development cohort was substantial with a Cohen's kappa of 0.74. The optimal prompt achieved an accuracy of 92%, sensitivity of 94%, specificity of 90%, positive predictive value 90%, negative predictive value 94%, and F1 score of 92%. Applying the optimized prompt to the entire cohort, we identified a total of 232 of patients with first VT recurrence 515±889 days from diagnosis. Using LLM-generated detection of VT recurrence, Cox regression revealed that the strongest predictor of VT recurrence was time-varying exposure to class I (hazard ratio [HR] 2.42, 95% CI 1.55-3.76, p<0.001), class II (HR 3.01, 95%CI 2.00-4.52, p<0.001), class III (HR 4.18, 95%CI 2.52-6.94, p<0.001), and amiodarone (HR 2.06, 95%CI 1.42-2.99, p<0.001). A significant negative interaction between class III agents and heart failure was found, indicating a lower-risk heart failure subgroup of patients on class IIIs. Conclusions: LLM can enable the study of VT recurrence and associated factors at scale. Anti-arrhythmics were predictors of recurrence with evidence of effect modification considering co-morbidity in a large registry. This approach may enable targeted interventions and personalized patient management strategies to improve clinical outcomes.

Article Details

Journal Circulation
Volume / Issue Vol. 152, Issue Suppl_3
Published November 04, 2025
ISSN 0009-7322
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Circulation

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0009-7322 Health Sciences

Authors (13)

S

Shirin Sadri

Stanford University, Mountain View, California, United States

K

Kelly Brennan

Stanford University, San Francisco, California, United States

S

Sabyasachi Bandyopadhyay

Y

Yaanik Desai

STANFORD FALK CVRC, Stanford, California, United States

P

Prasanth Ganesan

Department of Medicine (R.A.A., S.B., K.A.B., X.L., P.G., A.C.P., E.A.A., P.J.W., M.V.P., S.M.N., A.J.R.), Stanford University, CA.

E

Esteban Peralta

Stanford University, Mountain View, California, United States

R

Ruibin Feng

Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, United States

C

Charles Sillett

Stanford University, Mountain View, California, United States

S

Samuel Ruiperez-Campillo

Stanford University, Mountain View, California, United States

P

Paul Wang

Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States

P

Paul Clopton

Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States

A

Albert Rogers

Stanford University, Redwood City, California, United States

S

Sanjiv Narayan

STANFORD MEDICINE, Stanford, California, United States