Abstract 4366772: Timing and outcomes of staged coronary artery bypass grafting following percutaneous coronary intervention for STEMI – when should we intervene?

M Michael Catalano (University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States) Y Yu Zhao O Omar Toubat (University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States) A Alexandra Sperry (University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States) W Waseem Lutfi (University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States) K Kendall Lawrence (University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States) M Marisa Cevasco (University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States) M Mauer Biscotti (University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States) W Wilson Szeto (University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States) N Nimesh Desai (University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States) C Chase Brown

Abstract

Introduction: While recommendations exist to guide timing of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) following STEMI, the optimal timing of staged CABG following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for STEMI is unclear. Our aim is to utilize national claims data to assess national practice patterns for the timing of staged CABG following PCI for STEMI, predictors of timing and patient presentation, and the association of timing with post-operative outcomes. Methods: Inpatient Medicare MedPAR files were reviewed to identify patients aged ≥65 years who underwent isolated CABG from 10/2016-12/2021, who underwent urgent PCI for STEMI within the 12-months prior to CABG. Patients with a diagnosis of in-stent restenosis were excluded, isolating patients undergoing CABG for residual native disease. Timing of CABG relative to PCI was identified as same admission, elective readmission, and urgent readmission. The primary endpoint was five-year survival, assessed using propensity-matched Kaplan-Meier analysis with log-rank test, and Cox proportional hazards models. Comparison groups included same admission versus elective readmission, and elective versus urgent readmission. Among patients readmitted for CABG, predictors of presenting urgently were assessed utilizing logistic regression analysis. Results: During the study period, 428,867 patients underwent isolated CABG; of those, 14,652 (3.4%) underwent urgent PCI for ACS in the 12-months prior to CABG. After excluding patients with in-stent stenosis and NSTEMI diagnosis, the final cohort consisted of 7,792 STEMI patients who underwent CABG within 12-months of PCI for residual native disease. Among this cohort, 3,532 (45.3%) had CABG during the same admission as PCI, 2,805 (36.0%) returned for elective CABG, and 1,466 (18.8%) returned urgently for CABG. Patients undergoing same admission CABG had inferior five-year survival than those readmitted electively; however, patients readmitted urgently also had significantly reduced five-year survival (Figure 1, Table 1). Patients with increased comorbidity burden were more likely to be re-admitted urgently for CABG, with the highest risk ≤14 days post-PCI (Table 2). Conclusion: Among patients who undergo PCI for STEMI with residual coronary disease requiring CABG, optimal outcomes are observed in the setting of discharge and elective readmission; however, risk of disease progression and urgent readmission for revascularization must be weighed carefully.

Article Details

Journal Circulation
Volume / Issue Vol. 152, Issue Suppl_3
Published November 04, 2025
ISSN 0009-7322
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Circulation

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0009-7322 Health Sciences

Authors (11)

M

Michael Catalano

University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Y

Yu Zhao

O

Omar Toubat

University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

A

Alexandra Sperry

University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

W

Waseem Lutfi

University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

K

Kendall Lawrence

University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

M

Marisa Cevasco

University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

M

Mauer Biscotti

University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

W

Wilson Szeto

University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

N

Nimesh Desai

University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

C

Chase Brown