Abstract 4366386: The Impact of Race/Ethnicity, Education, and Income on Patient Engagement in Adult Congenital Heart Disease Care

A Andrea Sandoval Rivera (UC San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States) J Joseph Valente (UC San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States) K Keerthana Reddy Banala (Jackson Memorial hospital, Miami, Florida, United States) R Rong Duan (UC San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States) L Lindsay Alano (UCSF, San Francisco, California, United States) K Kim Parang (UCSF, San Francisco, California, United States) K Katia Bravo-Jaimes (Mayo clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, United States) M Mark Norris L Leigh Reardon P Philip Moons (KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium) M megumi okumura (UCSF, San Francisco, California, United States) M Michelle Gurvitz A Anushree Agarwal (UCSF, San Francisco, California, United States)

Abstract

Background: It is currently unknown whether patient engagement in adult congenital heart disease (CHD) care is influenced by social determinants of health (SDOH) such as race/ethnicity, education, and income. Adapting from the chronic care model, patient engagement, defined as the knowledge, skills, ability, and willingness to manage one’s health, can minimize lapses in care and improve CHD care outcomes. Methods: This cross-sectional study analyzes data from patients aged 18 and older with a self-reported diagnosis of CHD enrolled in a digital health research study called Empower My Congenital Heart. Patient engagement was measured using the Gothenburg Empowerment Scale (GES). We compared mean GES scores across demographic categories (race/ethnicity, education, and income), using independent samples t-tests or one-way ANOVA as appropriate. Additionally, we conducted a multivariate linear regression analysis to evaluate the impact of race/ethnicity, education, and income on GES scores, adjusting for age, gender, marital status, parental status, and employment status. Results: Of 323 adult CHD patients, the mean age was 45.6 ±15 years, 32.5% were males, 89.9% were non-Hispanic White, 29.7% had less than a Bachelor's degree, and 43.5% had less than $100,000 annual household income. The mean GES score was 61.8 ± 8, with significantly higher scores observed for non-Hispanic White identifying individuals (p=0.006) and those with a Bachelor's or higher level of education (p=0.005), while no difference across income levels (p = 0.394) (Figure 1). Linear regression analysis demonstrated that race and ethnicity remained significantly associated with GES scores (Table 1). Conclusions: Race/ethnicity and education level (in the bivariate analysis only), but not income, are the SDOH variables significantly associated with how empowered a CHD patient is in managing their health care. Future interventions that target enhancing patient engagement and self-management skills should take into consideration the influence of these demographic and social factors.

Article Details

Journal Circulation
Volume / Issue Vol. 152, Issue Suppl_3
Published November 04, 2025
ISSN 0009-7322
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Circulation

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0009-7322 Health Sciences

Authors (13)

A

Andrea Sandoval Rivera

UC San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States

J

Joseph Valente

UC San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States

K

Keerthana Reddy Banala

Jackson Memorial hospital, Miami, Florida, United States

R

Rong Duan

UC San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States

L

Lindsay Alano

UCSF, San Francisco, California, United States

K

Kim Parang

UCSF, San Francisco, California, United States

K

Katia Bravo-Jaimes

Mayo clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, United States

M

Mark Norris

L

Leigh Reardon

P

Philip Moons

KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium

M

megumi okumura

UCSF, San Francisco, California, United States

M

Michelle Gurvitz

A

Anushree Agarwal

UCSF, San Francisco, California, United States