Abstract 4365727: The role of fibroblast activation protein on left ventricular geometry, growth and extracellular matrix remodeling with pressure overload

A Amelia Churillo (University of South Carolina SOM and Columbia VA Health Care Center, Columbia, South Carolina, United States) L Lisa Freeburg (University of South Carolina SOM and Columbia VA Health Care Center, Columbia, South Carolina, United States) G Grayson Catherwood (University of South Carolina SOM, Columbia, South Carolina, United States) J Jumanah Al-Soudi (USC SCHOOL MEDICINE and Dorn VA, Columbia, South Carolina, United States) R Ricky Ruiz (USC SCHOOL MEDICINE and Dorn VA, Columbia, South Carolina, United States) E Eliana Cavalli (University of South Carolina SOM and Columbia VA Health Care Center, Columbia, South Carolina, United States) A An Van Laer (MEDICAL UNIVERSITY SOUTH CAROLINA, Charleston, South Carolina, United States) C Catalin Baicu (MEDICAL UNIVERSITY SOUTH CAROLINA, Charleston, South Carolina, United States) A Amy Bradshaw (MEDICAL UNIV OF SOUTH CAROLINA and RHJ VA Health Care System, Charleston, South Carolina, United States) M Michael Zile (RHJ Department of Veterans Affairs, Charleston, South Carolina, United States) F Francis Spinale (University of South Carolina SOM and Columbia VA Health Care Center, Columbia, South Carolina, United States)

Abstract

Background: Fibroblast activation protein (FAP) is abundantly expressed in cancer associated fibroblasts and contributes to extracellular matrix (ECM) remodeling. However, the role of FAP in terms of left ventricular (LV) structure and function, particularly with a chronic pressure overload (LVPO) remained unknown. This project tested the hypothesis that genetic ablation of FAP would modify LV structure and function with LVPO and be associated with changes in ECM remodeling. Methods and Results: Mice with FAP gene deletion (FAPKO, C57BL/6 background, ~13 and 20 weeks of age, with equal sex distribution) and age matched wild type (WT, equal sex distribution) underwent LV echocardiography (Baseline) and then were randomized to LVPO (transverse aortic constriction) for 28 days or referent control (No-LVPO) whereby LV function studies were repeated. Sample sizes and results are shown in Table. While LV ejection fraction (LVEF) fell slightly in both LVPO groups, this change was similar with WT and FAPKO. However, LV end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) was higher with LVPO in the FAPKO group. LV mass increased in both LVPO groups but was increased with FAPKO. Histomorphometry revealed increased myocyte cross sectional area (CSA) and percent collagen in both LVPO groups, but higher with FAPKO. Interestingly, LV hypertrophy and fibrosis also occurred with FAPKO in the absence of LVPO. At the transcriptional level (rtPCR) natriuretic peptide B (NPPB) mRNA levels were higher with LVPO in the FAPKO group as were collagen Type I levels (Col1A) and the tissue inhibitor of the matrix metalloproteinase-1 (TIMP-1). Conclusions: FAP gene deletion resulted in greater LV dilation, fibrosis and natriuretic peptide expression suggestive of acceleration of LV failure. FAP deletion with LVPO caused increased ECM expression and reduced indices of ECM turnover. Modulating FAP expression/activity with LVPO holds a novel therapeutic direction.

Article Details

Journal Circulation
Volume / Issue Vol. 152, Issue Suppl_3
Published November 04, 2025
ISSN 0009-7322
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Circulation

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0009-7322 Health Sciences

Authors (11)

A

Amelia Churillo

University of South Carolina SOM and Columbia VA Health Care Center, Columbia, South Carolina, United States

L

Lisa Freeburg

University of South Carolina SOM and Columbia VA Health Care Center, Columbia, South Carolina, United States

G

Grayson Catherwood

University of South Carolina SOM, Columbia, South Carolina, United States

J

Jumanah Al-Soudi

USC SCHOOL MEDICINE and Dorn VA, Columbia, South Carolina, United States

R

Ricky Ruiz

USC SCHOOL MEDICINE and Dorn VA, Columbia, South Carolina, United States

E

Eliana Cavalli

University of South Carolina SOM and Columbia VA Health Care Center, Columbia, South Carolina, United States

A

An Van Laer

MEDICAL UNIVERSITY SOUTH CAROLINA, Charleston, South Carolina, United States

C

Catalin Baicu

MEDICAL UNIVERSITY SOUTH CAROLINA, Charleston, South Carolina, United States

A

Amy Bradshaw

MEDICAL UNIV OF SOUTH CAROLINA and RHJ VA Health Care System, Charleston, South Carolina, United States

M

Michael Zile

RHJ Department of Veterans Affairs, Charleston, South Carolina, United States

F

Francis Spinale

University of South Carolina SOM and Columbia VA Health Care Center, Columbia, South Carolina, United States