Abstract 4364966: A Novel Machine Learning-based Adverse Cardiovascular Events Risk Algorithm For Cancer Patients Treated With Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors

S Shawn Wahi (Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, United States) J James Cross (Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, United States) R Ruben Mora (Lundquist Institute, Harbor-UCLA, Torrance, California, United States) Y Yunju Im (University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, United States) J Jennifer Kwan (Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, United States)

Abstract

Background: Cancer patients treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have an increased risk of adverse cardiovascular events (ACE). Traditional cardiovascular risk scores may not adequately capture TKI-associated cardiovascular toxicities or the unique features that contribute to ACE risk in this population. Recent studies have developed cardiovascular risk scores for cancer patients, achieving area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) values ranging from 0.65 to 0.85. Currently, there is no validated ACE risk algorithm designed specifically for TKI patients. Research question: Among cancer patients receiving TKIs, how well can a validated, interpretable machine learning-based algorithm predict risk of ACE? Methods: We analyzed 828 cancer patients treated with TKIs between 2020 and 2024 at a large academic center. Patient variables included demographics, comorbidities, lab values, cancer type, and imaging findings from echocardiography and cardiac MRI. The composite ACE outcome comprised myocardial infarction, coronary artery disease (CAD), arrhythmias, heart failure, valvular disease, atrioventricular block, and myocarditis. Data were partitioned into train (80%), test (10%), and holdout validation (10%) sets. An extreme gradient boosting (XGB) classifier was trained using 4-fold cross-validation on the train set, and performance was evaluated on the test set. Shapley Additive Explanation (SHAP) values were used to identify top predictive features. A multivariate logistic regression model was fit using selected features (based on SHAP values and clinical expertise) to form the final ACE risk score, which was then evaluated on the validation set. Results: ACE occurred in 37.8% of patients in our cohort. The XGB model achieved AUC 0.76 on the test set (Figure 1A) . Top SHAP features included age, sex, BMI, ejection fraction, hypertension, strain, metastasis, peripheral vascular disease, creatinine, hyperlipidemia, CAD, and chronic kidney disease (Figure 1C, Figure 2) . The final ACE risk algorithm trained on these features achieved 0.71 AUC, 71% accuracy, 0.73 precision, and 0.92 specificity on the holdout validation set (Figure 1B) . We integrate our ACE risk algorithm into a clinician-friendly online calculator (Figure 3) . Conclusion: We present a novel, interpretable, and clinically usable ACE risk score for cancer patients treated with TKIs, which may improve risk stratification and cardiovascular monitoring in this high-risk population.

Article Details

Journal Circulation
Volume / Issue Vol. 152, Issue Suppl_3
Published November 04, 2025
ISSN 0009-7322
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Circulation

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0009-7322 Health Sciences

Authors (5)

S

Shawn Wahi

Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, United States

J

James Cross

Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, United States

R

Ruben Mora

Lundquist Institute, Harbor-UCLA, Torrance, California, United States

Y

Yunju Im

University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, United States

J

Jennifer Kwan

Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, United States