Abstract 4364485: Physics-Based Engineering for Vascular Shunts: Optimizing Performance, Blood Flow, and Clot Prevention

Y Yi Qiao (Frontier Institute of Science and Technology, Interdisciplinary Research Center of Frontier Science and Technology, State Key Laboratory for Strength and Vibration of Mechanical Structures, Engineering Research Center of Key Materials for Efficient Utilization of Clean Energy of Shaanxi Province, Xi’an Key Laboratory of Electronic Devices and Material Chemistry) E Ethan Penn (Washington University in St Lous, Clayton, Missouri, United States) J Jacob Miller S Scott Bugenhagen (Washington University in St Lous, Clayton, Missouri, United States) R Ram Rohatgi (Washington University in St Louis, Saint Louis, Missouri, United States) K Kelsey Mercer (St. Louis Children's Hospital, St. Louis, Missouri, United States) B Blaire Kulp (Washington University in St Lous, Clayton, Missouri, United States) J Jinli Wang P Pirooz Eghtesady (WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY ST LOUIS, Saint Louis, Missouri, United States) G Guy Genin (Washington University in St Lous, Clayton, Missouri, United States) E Edon Rabinowitz (Washington University in St Lous, Clayton, Missouri, United States) D David Bark (Division of Hematology, Department of Pediatrics, Washington University)

Abstract

Background: The modified Blalock-Taussig-Thomas shunt (mBTTS) is a critical palliative procedure for infants with single-ventricle physiology, but thrombosis-related occlusion affects 8-12% of cases and carries nearly 50% mortality. Meanwhile, existing antithrombotic strategies fail to address the hemodynamic factors driving thrombosis, highlighting the need for a deeper understanding of flow dynamics in shunt failure. Research Question: Can engineering principles inform and optimize procedural interventions to reduce flow-mediated platelet activation and subsequent aggregation? Aims: This study aims to identify how mBTTS geometry influences hemodynamics and thrombosis risk, providing quantitative guidance for surgical planning and shunt design optimization. Methods: We used patient-specific imaging data to construct 54 idealized mBTTS configurations, systematically varying key geometric factors; pulmonary artery diameter, shunt diameter, and insertion angle. Using computational fluid dynamics, we analyzed how these variables influence wall shear rate (WSR), elongational strain rate (ESR), and turbulence intensity (TI); hemodynamic parameters known to affect thrombosis risk, to identify patterns linked to thrombosis. Results: We computationally identified optimal geometric configurations. Peak Wall Shear Rate (WSR) and Elongational Strain Rate (ESR) were primarily located at bifurcation points, while peak Turbulence Intensity (TI) was concentrated within the shunt channel. Shunt insertion distal to the right carotid artery with a 60° insertion angle and with a 4.0mm shunt graft demonstrated the most favorable hemodynamic profiles to prevent clots. Statistical analysis confirmed strong correlations between geometric parameters and flow characteristics. Conclusion: Results provide a framework for optimizing mBTTS design to reduce thrombosis risk based on hemodynamic risk factors, including actionable recommendations for shunt placement and design. These insights provide a foundation for hemodynamically guided surgical interventions with potential to improve survival rates in this high-risk patient population and for broader applications in cardiovascular surgery.

Article Details

Journal Circulation
Volume / Issue Vol. 152, Issue Suppl_3
Published November 04, 2025
ISSN 0009-7322
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Circulation

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0009-7322 Health Sciences

Authors (12)

Y

Yi Qiao

Frontier Institute of Science and Technology, Interdisciplinary Research Center of Frontier Science and Technology, State Key Laboratory for Strength and Vibration of Mechanical Structures, Engineering Research Center of Key Materials for Efficient Utilization of Clean Energy of Shaanxi Province, Xi’an Key Laboratory of Electronic Devices and Material Chemistry

E

Ethan Penn

Washington University in St Lous, Clayton, Missouri, United States

J

Jacob Miller

S

Scott Bugenhagen

Washington University in St Lous, Clayton, Missouri, United States

R

Ram Rohatgi

Washington University in St Louis, Saint Louis, Missouri, United States

K

Kelsey Mercer

St. Louis Children's Hospital, St. Louis, Missouri, United States

B

Blaire Kulp

Washington University in St Lous, Clayton, Missouri, United States

J

Jinli Wang

P

Pirooz Eghtesady

WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY ST LOUIS, Saint Louis, Missouri, United States

G

Guy Genin

Washington University in St Lous, Clayton, Missouri, United States

E

Edon Rabinowitz

Washington University in St Lous, Clayton, Missouri, United States

D

David Bark

Division of Hematology, Department of Pediatrics, Washington University