Abstract 4363398: Comparing Cardio-renal Outcomes of Finerenone versus Steroidal Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonist in Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction and Chronic Kidney Disease

O Olayinka Adebolu (Jefferson Einstein Medical enter, Elkins Park, Pennsylvania, United States) A Abiodun Idowu (Jefferson Einstein Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States) E Emmanuel Otabor (Jefferson Einstein Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States) P Phuuwadith Wattanachayakul (University of California Irvine School of Medicine, Orange, California, United States) M Michael Hamilton (Jefferson Einstein Medical enter, Elkins Park, Pennsylvania, United States)

Abstract

Introduction: Finerenone is a selective non-steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA) approved by FDA in 2021 for reducing the progression of albuminuria in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and type 2 diabetes mellitus. The FINEARTS-HF trial reported cardiovascular benefits in patients with heart failure with mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction. However, limited data exist comparing steroidal MRA with finerenone in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and CKD. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using Trinet X Global collaborative network from August 2021 to December 2024, including patients aged > 18 years with HFrEF and CKD. Patients treated with finerenone were propensity-matched 1:1 to those receiving either spironolactone or eplerenone. Outcomes of interest, assessed over a three-year follow-up period, included all-cause mortality, heart failure exacerbation, acute myocardial infarction (MI), atrial fibrillation, cerebrovascular accident (CVA), acute kidney injury (AKI), hyperkalemia, need for intravenous diuresis, new dialysis initiation, and major adverse cardiac events (MACE is a composite of all-cause mortality, HF exacerbation, MI, and CVA). Results: A total of 402 patients with an average age of 70 years, 65% males and 43% white. Steroidal MRA had a lower risk for new need for IV diuresis (HR: 1.63, 95% CI; 1.1 – 2.5, p = 0.026). There was no statistically significant difference in acute kidney injury (HR: 1.18, 95% CI; 0.84 – 1.64, p = 0.34), hyperkalemia (HR:0.89, 95% CI; 0.63 – 1.26, p = 0.52), initiation of dialysis (HR: 1.5, 95% CI; 0.8 – 2.8, p = 0.2), heart failure exacerbation (HR: 0.93, 95% CI; 0.6– 1.4, p = 0.73), acute myocardial infarction (HR: 1.3, 95% CI; 0.8 – 2.1, p = 0.2), atrial fibrillation (HR: 1.2, 95% CI; 0.8 – 1.9, p = 0.34), cerebrovascular accident (HR: 0.7, 95% CI; 0.3 – 1.3, p = 0.25) and MACE (HR: 0.7, 95% CI; 0.4 – 1.0, p = 0.06) between finerenone and steroidal MRA groups. The number of deaths in each group was fewer than ten, which limited the ability to report exact all-cause mortality events. Conclusion: In this real-world analysis of patients with HFrEF and CKD, we found that finerenone demonstrated a comparable cardio-renal safety and effectiveness profile to steroidal MRAs. Patients receiving finerenone had a higher risk of requiring intravenous diuresis, which may suggest differences in fluid management compared to steroidal MRAs.

Article Details

Journal Circulation
Volume / Issue Vol. 152, Issue Suppl_3
Published November 04, 2025
ISSN 0009-7322
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Circulation

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0009-7322 Health Sciences

Authors (5)

O

Olayinka Adebolu

Jefferson Einstein Medical enter, Elkins Park, Pennsylvania, United States

A

Abiodun Idowu

Jefferson Einstein Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

E

Emmanuel Otabor

Jefferson Einstein Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

P

Phuuwadith Wattanachayakul

University of California Irvine School of Medicine, Orange, California, United States

M

Michael Hamilton

Jefferson Einstein Medical enter, Elkins Park, Pennsylvania, United States