Abstract 4362660: Evaluating The Incidence And Risk Factors Of Ischemic Stroke After Left Atrial Appendage Closure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

A AJITHA V GANESAN (NYMC St Mary's General and St Clare, Parsippany, New Jersey, United States) I Inban Pugazhendi (NYMC St Mary's General and St Clare, Parsippany, New Jersey, United States) S Sulochana Gnanasekaran (NYMC St Mary's General and St Clare, Parsippany, New Jersey, United States) D Darshan Gandhi (St Marys General Hospital, Passaic, Cedar Grove, New Jersey, United States) W Warren Fernandes (Saint Vincent Hospital, Worcester, Massachusetts, United States) K Kaushal Patel (NYMC St Mary's General and St Clare, Parsippany, New Jersey, United States) G Gaurav Patel (NYMC St Micheal's Medical Center, Newark, New Jersey, United States) A Atul Prakash (St Marys General Hospital, Passaic, Cedar Grove, New Jersey, United States)

Abstract

Background: Left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) is increasingly used to reduce thromboembolic risk in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) who are unsuitable for long-term anticoagulation. Despite procedural success, ischemic strokes still occur post-LAAC. Understanding contributing risk factors remains critical to improving patient outcomes. Objectives: To assess the incidence of ischemic stroke following LAAC and evaluate associated risk factors, including device-related thrombus (DRT), peri-device leak (PDL > 5 mm), patient-level factors such as the CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and post-procedural anticoagulation strategies. Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library was conducted for studies between January 2015 and May 2025. Observational studies and clinical trials reporting stroke outcomes after LAAC were included. Meta-analyses were performed using random-effects models to pool odds ratios (ORs) for stroke associated with risk factors. Heterogeneity and publication bias were evaluated using I 2 statistics and funnel plots. Results: Nineteen studies comprising 14,982 patients were included. The pooled incidence of ischemic stroke post-LAAC was 2.4% (range: 0.5%–4.4%) over a mean follow-up of 18 months. DRT was significantly associated with increased stroke risk (OR 5.08; 95% CI 3.47–7.44), as was peri-device leak (PDL) (OR 1.63; 95% CI 1.06–2.52). Patients with CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc scores ≥4 had higher stroke rates (OR: 1.7, 95% CI: 1.2–2.5), and those with reduced LVEF (<50%) were also at increased risk (OR: 1.6, 95% CI: 1.1–2.4). Although post-procedural anticoagulation regimens varied across studies, extended anticoagulation appeared to offer protective benefits in selected populations. Conclusion: Ischemic stroke can still occur after successful deployment of the LAAC device. DRT and PDL are strong predictors of stroke, which warrant continued anticoagulation. Patient-level factors, such as elevated CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc scores and reduced LVEF, are at risk of stroke after LAAC. Individualized anticoagulation and antiplatelet strategies, as well as routine post-procedure imaging, may continue to be used to mitigate these risks and improve long-term outcomes.

Article Details

Journal Circulation
Volume / Issue Vol. 152, Issue Suppl_3
Published November 04, 2025
ISSN 0009-7322
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Circulation

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0009-7322 Health Sciences

Authors (8)

A

AJITHA V GANESAN

NYMC St Mary's General and St Clare, Parsippany, New Jersey, United States

I

Inban Pugazhendi

NYMC St Mary's General and St Clare, Parsippany, New Jersey, United States

S

Sulochana Gnanasekaran

NYMC St Mary's General and St Clare, Parsippany, New Jersey, United States

D

Darshan Gandhi

St Marys General Hospital, Passaic, Cedar Grove, New Jersey, United States

W

Warren Fernandes

Saint Vincent Hospital, Worcester, Massachusetts, United States

K

Kaushal Patel

NYMC St Mary's General and St Clare, Parsippany, New Jersey, United States

G

Gaurav Patel

NYMC St Micheal's Medical Center, Newark, New Jersey, United States

A

Atul Prakash

St Marys General Hospital, Passaic, Cedar Grove, New Jersey, United States