Abstract 4362656: Antithrombotic Strategies and Outcomes in Neonates and Infants with Cardiac Shunts: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Abstract
Background: Cardiac shunt thrombosis in neonates and infants remains a concern for shunt failure and mortality. Thromboprophylaxis for the prevention of shunt thrombosis is not an accepted standard due to a lack of high-level evidence. Despite the use of various antiplatelet and anticoagulant agents, thrombosis remains a common complication. In addition, limited evidence on the ideal antithrombotic approach for cardiac shunts, and there is variation in the agent selection and dosing utilized. Ultimately, the optimal strategy for thromboprophylaxis remains unknown. Objective: This systematic review aims to characterize antithrombotic strategies and outcomes in neonates and infants with a cardiac shunt. Methods: MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane’s CENTRAL were searched from inception through July 2024 for studies reporting shunt thrombosis prevalence among infants who received a cardiac shunt. We estimated the pooled prevalence of shunt thrombosis using random-effects meta-analysis. In the subgroup analysis, we evaluated the effects of shunt type and antithrombotic strategies on shunt thrombosis prevalence. Results: A total of 39 studies (29 retrospective, 10 prospective) were included, totaling 4735 patients. The most common shunt type was the modified Blalock-Taussig (mBTTS) (n=2224, 47%). Mortality related to shunt thrombosis occurred in 102 (26.2%) of patients with shunt thrombosis. The most common antithrombotic agents in the acute post-op setting were unfractionated heparin (UFH, n=1452, 30.7%) or aspirin (n=1413, 29.3%). The pooled prevalence of shunt thrombosis was 8.4% (95% Confidence Interval [CI], 6.5%-10.4%) and varied among antithrombotic agents: aspirin: 7.4% (95% CI, 4.0%-11.4%), UFH: 3.8% (95% CI, 0%-12.3%), or UFH followed by aspirin: 6.3% (95% CI, 3.6%-9.4%). Conclusions: This systematic review of nearly 5,000 neonates and infants reveals a high rate of mortality associated with shunt thrombosis. Collaborative prospective studies are warranted to evaluate antithrombotic regimen-outcome relationships and prognostic factors for shunt thrombosis and bleeding outcomes in these children.
Article Details
Authors (10)
Amy Kiskaddon
Johns Hopkins University, Saint Petersburg, Florida, United States
Neil Goldenberg
University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Marisol Betensky
Johns Hopkins University, Saint Petersburg, Florida, United States
Joshua Branstetter
CHOA, Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Dina Ashour
Johns Hopkins All Children's Hospital, St. Petersburg, Florida, United States
Pamela Williams
Johns Hopkins All Children's Hospital, St. Petersburg, Florida, United States
Arabela Stock
Johns Hopkins All Children's Hospital, St. Petersburg, Florida, United States
Michael Silvey
Children's Mercy Hospital, Kansas City, Missouri, United States
Therese Giglia
CHOP, Wallingford, Pennsylvania, United States
Nhue Do
Advocate Children's Heart Institute, Chicago, Illinois, United States