Abstract 4362307: Automated Aortic Valve Motion Analysis from Echocardiography for Efficient Classification of Aortic Stenosis Severity

F Farhan Mohammed (Victor Chang Cardiac Research, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia) T Tom Meredith (Victor Chang Cardiac Research, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia) A Amy Pomeroy (Victor Chang Cardiac Research, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia) S Sebastiano Barbieri E Erik Meijering J Jason Kovacic (ST VINCENTS, Bronte Nsw, New South Wales, Australia) C Christopher Hayward D David Muller M Michael Feneley (St Vincents Hospital, Darlinghurst, New South Wales, Australia) M Mayooran Namasivayam (St Vincent's Hospital Sydney, Darlinghurst, New South Wales, Australia)

Abstract

Background: Aortic stenosis (AS) severity assessment traditionally relies on Doppler echocardiography, which is time-consuming and may be inconclusive in a subset of patients. Efficient, automated approaches using routinely acquired 2D echocardiographic views could support clinical workflows by rapidly classifying AS severity with minimal user input. Research Question: Can a computer vision algorithm applied to a single echocardiographic view efficiently classify AS severity based on aortic valve leaflet motion? Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 223 echocardiograms from patients undergoing routine clinical evaluation for suspected AS across the entire severity spectrum. All studies included parasternal long-axis (PLAX) views for visualising aortic valve motion. A semi-automated computer vision algorithm was developed to track the angular motion of the right coronary cusp (RCC) of the aortic valve. From this, we derived a novel quantitative feature, leaflet angular displacement. To normalise for hemodynamic variability, leaflet displacement was indexed by transaortic volumetric flow rate derived from Doppler measurements, resulting in a derived metric termed displacement:flow ratio. AS severity was classified into three categories – no AS, moderate AS, and severe AS – based on current clinical guidelines. We evaluated model performance using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. Results: Of the 223 patients included, 65 had no AS, 69 had moderate AS, and 89 had severe AS. The algorithm achieved an overall classification accuracy of 87.13%, with an AUC of 0.96 (Figure 1), demonstrating excellent discriminative capability. The sensitivity for detecting AS was 95.24%, while the specificity was 84.38%. Performance was highest in studies with optimal leaflet visualisation, where the algorithm exhibited robust tracking and consistent measurements. Conclusions: Leaflet motion analysis from the PLAX view using computer vision enables efficient classification of AS severity without the need for Doppler data. This approach holds promise as a rapid screening tool to augment existing clinical workflows, particularly where Doppler measurements are challenging or unavailable. Future work will focus on improving robustness to suboptimal imaging, extending the approach to incorporate additional echocardiographic views, and validating model performance to support generalizability and translation.

Article Details

Journal Circulation
Volume / Issue Vol. 152, Issue Suppl_3
Published November 04, 2025
ISSN 0009-7322
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Circulation

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0009-7322 Health Sciences

Authors (10)

F

Farhan Mohammed

Victor Chang Cardiac Research, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

T

Tom Meredith

Victor Chang Cardiac Research, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

A

Amy Pomeroy

Victor Chang Cardiac Research, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

S

Sebastiano Barbieri

E

Erik Meijering

J

Jason Kovacic

ST VINCENTS, Bronte Nsw, New South Wales, Australia

C

Christopher Hayward

D

David Muller

M

Michael Feneley

St Vincents Hospital, Darlinghurst, New South Wales, Australia

M

Mayooran Namasivayam

St Vincent's Hospital Sydney, Darlinghurst, New South Wales, Australia