Abstract 4362017: Patient Preferences for Antithrombotic Therapy for Stroke Prevention in Device-Detected Subclinical Atrial Fibrillation: A Probability Trade-Off Interview Study

R Rubani Suri (McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada) F Feng Xie J Jeff Healey (McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada) M Mellanie Hills (StopAfib.org, Greenwood, Texas, United States) T Trudie Lobban M Melzee Diao (McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada) C Catalina Ribas (McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada) D Deborah Siegal A Alexander Benz (Population Health Research Institut, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada) P PJ Devereaux (Population Health Research Institute, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada) R Renato Lopes (DUKE CLINICAL RESEARCH, Durham, North Carolina, United States) W William McIntyre (McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada)

Abstract

Introduction: Device-detected subclinical atrial fibrillation (AF) is common in patients with implanted cardiac rhythm devices. The ARTESiA trial demonstrated that in patients with subclinical AF, apixaban, as compared to aspirin, reduced stroke (0.98% versus 2.25% per year, 5 fewer strokes in 4 years with CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc > 4). However, apixaban also increased major bleeding (2.13% vs 1.45% per year, 2.72 more bleeds in 4 years with CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc > 4). Our objective was to estimate patient thresholds for stroke prevention and bleeding avoidance, as these factors may influence treatment decisions. Methods: Trained interviewers enrolled patients with a CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score ≥ 4 (irrespective of AF history) from a tertiary care pacemaker/defibrillator clinic. Participants underwent a structured interview with a probability trade-off tool. We determined risk thresholds for the minimum 4-year reduction in stroke necessary to prefer apixaban compared to aspirin (minimal important difference, stroke MID) and the maximum tolerable number of major bleeds to prevent one stroke (maximum allowable difference, bleed MAD). We grouped participants into one of four preference clusters: stroke averse (accepting of bleeds to prevent stroke), bleeding averse (accepting of stroke to prevent bleeds), realist (accepting of stroke or bleed) and idealist (unwilling to accept stroke or bleed). Results: Among 415 individuals approached, 300 participants consented and 275 completed the full interview. Mean age was 81.5 ± 6.9 years, 55.3% were female, median CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score was 4 (IQR 4-5), and 148 (53.8%) had a history of AF. The overall mean stroke MID was 5.0 ± 4.5, meaning that on average, patients require a 5% reduction in stroke over 4 years of follow up to justify apixaban over aspirin. The overall bleed MAD was 8.0 ± 4.0, meaning that on average, patients were willing to endure 8 additional major bleeds to prevent one stroke. The highest proportion of participants were stroke averse (49.1%); a minority were bleeding averse (16.7%), realist (15.3%) and idealist (18.9%) [Figure]. Conclusions: Among patients with a cardiac rhythm device and CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc ≥ 4, the mean stroke risk reduction to justify the increased bleeding risk on apixaban, as compared to aspirin, is in line with the reduction in stroke seen for patients with subclinical AF in ARTESiA. Patients will accept a mean 8 additional bleeds to prevent one stroke. Patients are 3 times more likely to be stroke averse than bleeding averse.

Article Details

Journal Circulation
Volume / Issue Vol. 152, Issue Suppl_3
Published November 04, 2025
ISSN 0009-7322
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Circulation

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0009-7322 Health Sciences

Authors (12)

R

Rubani Suri

McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

F

Feng Xie

J

Jeff Healey

McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

M

Mellanie Hills

StopAfib.org, Greenwood, Texas, United States

T

Trudie Lobban

M

Melzee Diao

McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

C

Catalina Ribas

McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

D

Deborah Siegal

A

Alexander Benz

Population Health Research Institut, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

P

PJ Devereaux

Population Health Research Institute, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

R

Renato Lopes

DUKE CLINICAL RESEARCH, Durham, North Carolina, United States

W

William McIntyre

McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada