Abstract 4362007: Sex-Specific Prognostic Implications of Coronary Physiology and Microvascular Dysfunction

Abstract

Background: Sex differences in coronary physiology have been reported, particularly with regard to higher resting coronary flow in women. Resting flow is independently associated with clinical outcomes, irrespective of the presence of coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD), but its sex-specific prognostic significance remains unclear. Aims: This study aimed to compare the prognostic implications of resting flow and CMD between sexes among patients with angina and non-obstructive coronary arteries (ANOCA). Methods: We studied 1194 patients with ANOCA undergoing coronary reactivity testing. Endothelium-independent microvascular function was assessed by coronary flow reserve (CFR) during adenosine-induced hyperemia, and endothelium-dependent function by coronary blood flow (CBF) increase during intracoronary acetylcholine infusion. Endothelium-dependent CMD was defined as <50% CBF increase, and endothelium-independent CMD as CFR <2.5. Cardiovascular events were defined as a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction and heart failure. Results: The median age of the study population was 52 years, and 71.1% were women. Resting average peak velocity (rAPV) and baseline CBF (bCBF) were significantly higher in women (p<0.001 and p=0.006, respectively). Survival analysis revealed that both elevated rAPV and bCBF were significantly associated with worse outcomes in men (p<0.001 and p=0.036, respectively, Figure 1), whereas no such associations were observed in women. In Cox proportional hazard analysis, sex showed a significant interaction effect with elevated rAPV (interaction p=0.014). Furthermore, endothelium-independent CMD was significantly associated with adverse outcomes in both men and women (p=0.011 and p=0.004, respectively), whereas endothelium-dependent CMD was significantly associated with prognosis only in men (p=0.006). Among men with endothelium-dependent CMD, the subtype characterized by higher bCBF was particularly associated with worse prognosis (p=0.001, Figure 2). Conclusions: In patients with ANOCA, men had lower resting coronary flow than women. However, its association with adverse outcomes was observed only in men, especially in those with impaired endothelial function. These results suggest that coronary physiology should be interpreted differently by sex, and that clinical decisions should be adjusted accordingly.